Bureaucrats, checkuser, Interface administrators, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Suppressors, Administrators
83,693
edits
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (added Category:SpamFighting using HotCat) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (more wikilinks & interwiki, cat) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''spam blacklist''' is a list of sites deemed | The '''spam blacklist''' is a list of sites deemed [[spam]]my or otherwise objectionable – whose URLs are blocked from being added to [[wiki]] pages by [[mw:Extension:SpamBlacklist]], currently in use on more than 2,000 {{tag|MediaWiki}} installations, as listed [[wikiapiary:Extension:SpamBlacklist|here]] on [[WikiApiary]]. That extension is usually configured to pull its data from [[Meta-Wiki]]'s spam blacklist page, found [[MetaWiki:Spam blacklist|here]]. That blacklist contains a number of sites, such as [[Metapedia]], that are blocked for political incorrectness rather than spamminess. Some sites, such as [[wp:examiner.com|examiner.com]], are blocked because they are considered [[wp:Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|unreliable sources]] that users should be prevented from adding to articles. Link shorteners such as [[wp:TinyUrl|TinyUrl]] are also blocked, since they could be used to work around the other spam blacklist restrictions. | ||
It is questionable how effective this spam blacklist is at keeping spam off of third-party wikis. Some spam might be targeted only at [[Wikimedia]] wikis, or only at third-party wikis, which would make the list of little help to said third-party wikis. Also, some third-party wikis might prefer that users be allowed to cite sources that are not considered reliable on Wikipedia. Users may not always realize that, when a link is rejected as spammy, it does not necessarily mean that the individual wiki he is editing has specifically chosen to ban that URL. | It is questionable how effective this spam blacklist is at keeping spam off of [[:Category:All|third-party wikis]]. Some spam might be targeted only at [[:Category:Wikimedia Foundation|Wikimedia Foundation]] wikis, or only at third-party wikis, which would make the list of little help to said third-party wikis. Also, some third-party wikis might prefer that users be allowed to cite sources that are not considered reliable on Wikipedia. Users may not always realize that, when a link is rejected as spammy, it does not necessarily mean that the individual wiki he is editing has specifically chosen to ban that URL. | ||
[[Category:MediaWiki| ]] | |||
[[Category:WikiIdea]] | [[Category:WikiIdea]] | ||
[[Category:SpamFighting]] | [[Category:SpamFighting]] | ||
edits