Please add your wiki, and join our community.
Note: WikiIndex is not a wiki hosting service.
(please log-in to bypass the anti-spam CAPTCHA and remove this heading notice)
Nathania: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→In U.S. federal court
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
:Mr. Larson heard first-hand from fellow incarcerated individuals about sex offender laws, the treatment sex offenders received by various prison facilities, and the movement to challenge harsh sex offender sentencing practices. Consistent with Mr. Larson’s practice of seeking to help those seemingly shunned by society, particularly through writing, he began interviewing inmates, researching the issues, and writing articles. | :Mr. Larson heard first-hand from fellow incarcerated individuals about sex offender laws, the treatment sex offenders received by various prison facilities, and the movement to challenge harsh sex offender sentencing practices. Consistent with Mr. Larson’s practice of seeking to help those seemingly shunned by society, particularly through writing, he began interviewing inmates, researching the issues, and writing articles. | ||
On 7 December 2012, U.S. District Judge Gerald Bruce Lee expressed his concerns about the site:[http://nathania.org/w/images/c/cb/Nathan_Larson_1-10-cr-00249-GBL_Document_53.pdf] | She continued, "he learned about the treatment of sex offenders by the Bureau of Prisons and as well as a movement to revamp the sex offender guidelines and punishment with respect to that." On 7 December 2012, U.S. District Judge Gerald Bruce Lee expressed his concerns about the site:[http://nathania.org/w/images/c/cb/Nathan_Larson_1-10-cr-00249-GBL_Document_53.pdf] | ||
:I really don't have any objection to your having opinions about politics, about history, about government or anything. But when you start talking about sex with children and posting pictures of children in provocative poses in underwear, maybe not child pornography, but it's just odd that that would be a part of your website to me if your interest is to build something that everybody can participate in. | :I really don't have any objection to your having opinions about politics, about history, about government or anything. But when you start talking about sex with children and posting pictures of children in provocative poses in underwear, maybe not child pornography, but it's just odd that that would be a part of your website to me if your interest is to build something that everybody can participate in. | ||