1,756
edits
User talk:Elassint: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Leucosticte
(→Leucosticte: new section) |
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 111: | Line 111: | ||
Why do you let write about himself and add links to pedophile sites? [[User:Sophie Wilder|Sophie Wilder]] ([[User talk:Sophie Wilder|talk]]) 15:13, 4 March 2014 (UTC) | Why do you let write about himself and add links to pedophile sites? [[User:Sophie Wilder|Sophie Wilder]] ([[User talk:Sophie Wilder|talk]]) 15:13, 4 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
:I guess the question would be, Why not? [[WikiIndex:About]] says, "The [[:Category:Wiki People|people]] of WikiIndex are creating a complete directory of all [[:Category:Wiki|wiki]] websites on the Internet." Completeness usually requires that people write about themselves and their sites, because often no one else cares about the topic. [[WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines]] says 'One man's "irrelevant" can be another's "interesting".' [[WikiIndex:FrequentlyAskedQuestions]] says, "[[WikiIndex]] is not the same as [[:Category:Wikipedia|Wikipedia]]. Original research is allowed. Having a point of view is allowed." | |||
:This is not like RationalWiki, which has a goal of catering to leftist orthodoxy and letting the leftist mob rule, even at the expense of making the truth known. RationalWiki makes it clear, by how they treat people and the content they allow to remain on the site, that non-leftists are mostly unwelcome; WikiIndex tries to be more inclusive and eclectic. Rather than subtracting facts from articles, why don't you add facts? That would better serve the goal of helping people become well-informed. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 15:25, 4 March 2014 (UTC) | |||