1,756
edits
User talk:Abd: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→So basically...: http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Ratchetpedia&diff=171941&oldid=139478
(→So basically...: no, he is not saying that. He said something offhand about 5 years ago, that you made be that.) |
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (→So basically...: http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Ratchetpedia&diff=171941&oldid=139478) |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
== So basically... == | == So basically... == | ||
Mark is [[User:Lumenos/WikiIndex_(unwritten)_policies#Bureaucrats|saying]] that we should in fact have attack pages, as long as they're labeled "constructive criticism". [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 17:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | Mark is [[User:Lumenos/WikiIndex_(unwritten)_policies#Bureaucrats|saying]] that we should in fact have attack pages, as long as they're labeled "constructive criticism". [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Ratchetpedia&diff=171941&oldid=139478 Here] is an example. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 17:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
*That comment was not made on the page you edited, i.e., what you cite. It was copied there by Lumenos. The original edit was referenced as a page since archived, the present edit is on [[Category talk:Active administrators of this wiki/Archive 2008-09]]. It's just an off-hand comment, an idea. Bad Idea, I might add, though not Truly Terrible. It's just what someone might think up off-the-cuff. | *That comment was not made on the page you edited, i.e., what you cite. It was copied there by Lumenos. The original edit was referenced as a page since archived, the present edit is on [[Category talk:Active administrators of this wiki/Archive 2008-09]]. It's just an off-hand comment, an idea. Bad Idea, I might add, though not Truly Terrible. It's just what someone might think up off-the-cuff. | ||