Talk:MZMcBride: Difference between revisions

1,241 bytes removed ,  13 March 2014
no edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 9: Line 9:
::Basic to articles about living people would be context and necessity. If WikiIndex were to have articles on Wiki people at the level of notability and the level of opinion that you are allowing, by your actions, it would become an administrative nightmare. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 16:59, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
::Basic to articles about living people would be context and necessity. If WikiIndex were to have articles on Wiki people at the level of notability and the level of opinion that you are allowing, by your actions, it would become an administrative nightmare. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 16:59, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
:::Since when was it a battle? I would say that I agree with what he wrote in his Bugzilla-related essay, and he'd probably agree with what I wrote in my Bugzilla-related essay. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 17:06, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
:::Since when was it a battle? I would say that I agree with what he wrote in his Bugzilla-related essay, and he'd probably agree with what I wrote in my Bugzilla-related essay. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 17:06, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
== Double standards ==
"Leucosticte is creating page essays on wiki users based on his personal issues." So basically, you can point out people's behavior that you don't like, but you don't want other people's behavior being documented. Doesn't that open up a can of worms too, when it becomes the norm for users to criticize articles based on what they think the article creator's motives are, rather than on the article itself? Anyway, if you get away with this, and Elassint or somebody deletes the article based on a similar rationale as why [[Research psychologist]] was deleted, that'll be pretty demoralizing.
Maybe the article shouldn't stay; maybe there are other reasons for deletion, but accusations of harassment are such are the wrong reasons to delete, in this case even more than with Research psychologist, because this article doesn't say anything bad about MZM. Actually, though, I probably shouldn't get demoralized; really I should be used to this kind of stuff by now. Not that this particular case matters that much, but it's more that the precedent will end up applying to other stuff. It'll have a {{w|chilling effect}}. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 08:03, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
1,756

edits