5,924
edits
User talk:Hoof Hearted: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Computer // Computers: no s
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (→Computer // Computers: reply to Manorainjan and Mark) |
Manorainjan (talk | contribs) (→Computer // Computers: no s) |
||
| Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
:: as above ... --[[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 21:31, 30 July 2014 (UTC) | :: as above ... --[[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 21:31, 30 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
These two categories were created LONG before I found WikiIndex. As Mark said, we have discussed this previously many times . . . and never really reached a concrete answer. From my own perspective, a category normally always contains more than one article on said subject, so from that logic, categories ''should'' be plural. However, if the singular sounds 'better' and more gramatically correct, then use the singular. How's that for some 'fence sitting'???? [[User:Hoof Hearted|Sean, aka <small>Hoof Hearted</small>]] • <sub>[[:Category:Active administrators of this wiki|Admin]] / [[WikiIndex:Bureaucrats|'Crat]]</sub> • <small>[[User talk:Hoof Hearted|talk2HH]]</small> 22:01, 30 July 2014 (UTC) | ::: These two categories were created LONG before I found WikiIndex. As Mark said, we have discussed this previously many times . . . and never really reached a concrete answer. From my own perspective, a category normally always contains more than one article on said subject, so from that logic, categories ''should'' be plural. However, if the singular sounds 'better' and more gramatically correct, then use the singular. How's that for some 'fence sitting'???? [[User:Hoof Hearted|Sean, aka <small>Hoof Hearted</small>]] • <sub>[[:Category:Active administrators of this wiki|Admin]] / [[WikiIndex:Bureaucrats|'Crat]]</sub> • <small>[[User talk:Hoof Hearted|talk2HH]]</small> 22:01, 30 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::: OK, I settle on the no-s-side of the fence because of the "keep it simple" POV. It is not wrong to say computer as a label. But it would be wrong to say technologies, even if in America this kind of logical mistake is the norm. And apples would be definitely not something invented in Cupertino. I imagined some serious difference in between the two, but if it is only for the sake of style, cut the s and merge the two! | |||