WikiIndex talk:Prohibited content: Difference between revisions
→Policy drafting: new section
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(→Policy drafting: new section) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::::Sure. If. Not allowed to stand. Q.E.D. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 18:06, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | ::::Sure. If. Not allowed to stand. Q.E.D. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 18:06, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::::So basically, it can be harder to promulgate a written policy than to impose the practices that create a de facto policy. Any user can revert a change to a policy page, but only a sysop can take the sysop actions that policies reflect. So we have a situation in which there are unwritten rules that don't give users fair warning of what to expect. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 18:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | :::::So basically, it can be harder to promulgate a written policy than to impose the practices that create a de facto policy. Any user can revert a change to a policy page, but only a sysop can take the sysop actions that policies reflect. So we have a situation in which there are unwritten rules that don't give users fair warning of what to expect. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 18:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Policy drafting == | |||
This policy will need improvement before it could be considered. While I like the idea of barring sicko material and self spam, the draft has been written in a stilted manner by L to indicate how ridiculous he thinks it is. [[Special:Contributions/173.255.192.138|173.255.192.138]] 18:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | |||