331
edits
WikiIndex talk:Prohibited content: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Not linking, but documenting: traditionally, very small wikis (like one person active) can still be indexed.
(→My views on what is prohibited content,: thanks, Arcane) |
(→Not linking, but documenting: traditionally, very small wikis (like one person active) can still be indexed.) |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
I think we should have an all or nothing policy. Even with a no linking policy on certain wikis, we would still give them attention and plenty of people would try to go to them, even if they are malicious. Plus with spam self promotion by narcissistic loner admins, they'll still use WikiIndex as a dumping ground for their nonsense even if they can't link directly to it; the name of the wiki in Google would be enough. –maelstr0m [[Special:Contributions/173.255.192.138|173.255.192.138]] 20:06, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | I think we should have an all or nothing policy. Even with a no linking policy on certain wikis, we would still give them attention and plenty of people would try to go to them, even if they are malicious. Plus with spam self promotion by narcissistic loner admins, they'll still use WikiIndex as a dumping ground for their nonsense even if they can't link directly to it; the name of the wiki in Google would be enough. –maelstr0m [[Special:Contributions/173.255.192.138|173.255.192.138]] 20:06, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
:WikiIndex has traditionally allowed "narcissistic loner admins" to have their wikis linked, if they are wikis. This is a category being made up to attack a specific user, never mind that he invites it. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 21:13, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
== My views on what is prohibited content, == | == My views on what is prohibited content, == | ||