1,756
edits
m (→BoyWiki: specify) |
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 310: | Line 310: | ||
::::BoyWiki has been around a long time. I wanted to see the history of the page. All this controversy around listing wikis started with Leucosticte. | ::::BoyWiki has been around a long time. I wanted to see the history of the page. All this controversy around listing wikis started with Leucosticte. | ||
::::The argument about RationalWiki takes the cake. The complaints from RationalWiki were not about that page, they were about Leucosticte. [http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:WikiIndex&oldid=1337410 Here] is the page. They are ''not'' going to complain if the BoyWiki page is restored and blanked. They are not complete idiots. By the way, Leucosticte claims they ban anyone who disagrees with them. Huh! I'm still a sysop there. I found it useless, but I an ''not'' banned. I got no flack for that commentary, which was very mild by RatWiki standards. RatWiki ''runs'' on flames. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 00:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC) | ::::The argument about RationalWiki takes the cake. The complaints from RationalWiki were not about that page, they were about Leucosticte. [http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:WikiIndex&oldid=1337410 Here] is the page. They are ''not'' going to complain if the BoyWiki page is restored and blanked. They are not complete idiots. By the way, Leucosticte claims they ban anyone who disagrees with them. Huh! I'm still a sysop there. I found it useless, but I an ''not'' banned. I got no flack for that commentary, which was very mild by RatWiki standards. RatWiki ''runs'' on flames. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 00:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::::The RationalWikians' complaint is, specifically, that I dominate WikiIndex. If sysops are observed to be overriding my decisions, then the RWians have no grounds for that complaint. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 01:48, 7 January 2015 (UTC) |
edits