3,206
edits
User talk:Koavf: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→unrequested deletion of structure
Manorainjan (talk | contribs) (→unrequested deletion of structure: insinuations are not arguments) |
|||
| Line 460: | Line 460: | ||
Our Wiki is different from all the other wikis. It is the wiki of wikis. At least it wants to be ... ;-) This being different results in many IP-editors for example. Otherwise, we would have a user account for every wiki page, because each and every admin of a wiki would have to create an account for maintaining "his" page on "our" wiki. Certainly the handful of regular users don't want to and are completely unable to teach 20.ooo Users how to edit those pages. Whereas I see another opportunity to remind, that we are keeping about 4% of the [[Wikisphere]] only with our "few" pages here. At other occasions I got hars responses telling, that his Wiki is NOT Wikipedia and I shall not try to introduce/request/expect/impose wikipedian style here. We got to learn from other wikis, if not we want to invent the wheel over and again with our extremely limited personal resources. Therefore I reject the insinuation, that my idea would be bad only because I would no know any other wiki who does similar. I'm saying this in general, like also for the next topic "unwarranted deletion of user pages". Such an insinuation can not count as an argument at all. [[User_talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 15:07, 21 June 2015 (PDT) | Our Wiki is different from all the other wikis. It is the wiki of wikis. At least it wants to be ... ;-) This being different results in many IP-editors for example. Otherwise, we would have a user account for every wiki page, because each and every admin of a wiki would have to create an account for maintaining "his" page on "our" wiki. Certainly the handful of regular users don't want to and are completely unable to teach 20.ooo Users how to edit those pages. Whereas I see another opportunity to remind, that we are keeping about 4% of the [[Wikisphere]] only with our "few" pages here. At other occasions I got hars responses telling, that his Wiki is NOT Wikipedia and I shall not try to introduce/request/expect/impose wikipedian style here. We got to learn from other wikis, if not we want to invent the wheel over and again with our extremely limited personal resources. Therefore I reject the insinuation, that my idea would be bad only because I would no know any other wiki who does similar. I'm saying this in general, like also for the next topic "unwarranted deletion of user pages". Such an insinuation can not count as an argument at all. [[User_talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 15:07, 21 June 2015 (PDT) | ||
:'''Arguments''' If you think that I or anyone else is going to agree to your terms of debate, you're mistaken. I'm asking because I'm trying to gauge ''why'' you insist on this. Just as insinuations are not arguments, nor are bald assertions. If you can demonstrate some value in an endless string of category redirects or redlink userpages of accounts that have made zero edits being categorized, I'm willing to read it. Otherwise, you are wasting time--as you point out above, there's a lot more to cover on this site than every iteration of every word for "Spanish" or user categories for users who have never edited. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 15:11, 21 June 2015 (PDT) | |||
== unwarranted deletion of user pages == | == unwarranted deletion of user pages == | ||