Bureaucrats, checkuser, Interface administrators, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Suppressors, Administrators
83,693
edits
Category talk:Wikipedia: Difference between revisions
{{see also|Talk:Wikipedia}}, added some wikilinks
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (→PlaceOpedia?: PlaceOpedia hasn't been updated for over four years - its' last update was August 2008. Should we delete its external link from the template? ~~~~) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) ({{see also|Talk:Wikipedia}}, added some wikilinks) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TOCright}} | {{TOCright}} | ||
== Wiki Topic template == | {{see also|Talk:Wikipedia}} | ||
Mark, I like this idea. It took me a while to understand it. Now that I do, I like it. There's a problem here that we have to fix. Remember when we developed the Wiki Engine template? We couldn't just use the Wiki template because it made sub-categories of All, Vibrant, etc. The same is true here. And we decided at that time to use a soft-redirect from the main namespace page to the category page so that we could put the categories there (all, vibrant, etc). I think we need to do the same here. I'm going to give it a shot, okay? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 12:53, 11 June 2006 (EDT) | ==Wiki Topic template== | ||
: Okay, I went ahead and made the new template. I'm not sure what to do about the Wikimedia Foundation category, however. Any thoughts? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:07, 11 June 2006 (EDT) | Mark, I like this idea. It took me a while to understand it. Now that I do, I like it. There's a problem here that we have to fix. Remember when we developed the [[Template:Wiki Engine|Wiki Engine template]]? We couldn't just use the Wiki template because it made sub-categories of [[:Category:All|All]], [[:Category:Vibrant|Vibrant]], etc. The same is true here. And we decided at that time to use a soft-redirect from the main namespace page to the category page so that we could put the categories there (all, vibrant, etc). I think we need to do the same here. I'm going to give it a shot, okay? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 12:53, 11 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
: Okay, I went ahead and made the new template. I'm not sure what to do about the [[:Category:Wikimedia Foundation|Wikimedia Foundation category]], however. Any thoughts? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:07, 11 June 2006 (EDT) | |||
== Want a challenge? == | ==Want a challenge?== | ||
I think it's a little bit messy, if you want a challenge, you can do this to tidy up: I.e. on the English page write <nowiki>[[Category:Wikipedia|en]]</nowiki> and so on for all the languages. Somebody up? – [[User:Smiddle|Smiddle]] / <small>[[User talk:Smiddle|T]]·[[Special:Contributions/Smiddle|C]]·[[Special:Search/Smiddle|S]]·[[Special:Allpages/Smiddle|A]]</small> 16:29, 21 October 2006 (EDT) | I think it's a little bit messy, if you want a challenge, you can do this to tidy up: I.e. on the English page write <nowiki>[[Category:Wikipedia|en]]</nowiki> and so on for all the languages. Somebody up? – [[User:Smiddle|Smiddle]] / <small>[[User talk:Smiddle|T]]·[[Special:Contributions/Smiddle|C]]·[[Special:Search/Smiddle|S]]·[[Special:Allpages/Smiddle|A]]</small> 16:29, 21 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
:Just to clarify, you would prefer to alphabetize by the ISO language code rather than the pagename? That sounds reasonable, but I worry that the casual observer won't understand how we've organized the category. After all, the language codes do not appear in the pagename. Of course, I can't read Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, Japanese, Korean, or Thai, so it's not easy to tell which wiki is which in this category anyway. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 15:18, 4 December 2008 (EST) | :Just to clarify, you would prefer to alphabetize by the ISO language code rather than the pagename? That sounds reasonable, but I worry that the casual observer won't understand how we've organized the category. After all, the language codes do not appear in the pagename. Of course, I can't read Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, Japanese, Korean, or Thai, so it's not easy to tell which wiki is which in this category anyway. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 15:18, 4 December 2008 (EST) | ||
== PlaceOpedia? == | ==PlaceOpedia?== | ||
I wanted to look at WikiIndex's page about Wikipedia and noticed Category:Wikipedia has external link to PlaceOpedia. Should WikiIndex have a page about PlaceOpedia? I was going to start an article, but wasn't sure what shape the article should take (PlaceOpedia doesn't seem like a wiki, so I'm guessing [[template:wiki]] should not be used on it. --[[User:EarthFurst|EarthFurst]] 16:07, 4 May 2007 (PDT) | I wanted to look at WikiIndex's page about Wikipedia and noticed Category:Wikipedia has external link to PlaceOpedia. Should WikiIndex have a page about PlaceOpedia? I was going to start an article, but wasn't sure what shape the article should take (PlaceOpedia doesn't seem like a wiki, so I'm guessing [[template:wiki]] should not be used on it. --[[User:EarthFurst|EarthFurst]] 16:07, 4 May 2007 (PDT) | ||
:PlaceOpedia hasn't been updated for over four years - its' last update was August 2008. Should we delete its external link from the template? [[User:Hoof Hearted|Sean, aka <small>Hoof Hearted</small>]] • <sub>[[:Category:Active administrators of this wiki|Admin]]</sub> • <small>[[User talk:Hoof Hearted|talk2HH]]</small> 15:21, 6 December 2012 (PST) | :PlaceOpedia hasn't been updated for over four years - its' last update was August 2008. Should we delete its external link from the template? [[User:Hoof Hearted|Sean, aka <small>Hoof Hearted</small>]] • <sub>[[:Category:Active administrators of this wiki|Admin]]</sub> • <small>[[User talk:Hoof Hearted|talk2HH]]</small> 15:21, 6 December 2012 (PST) | ||
== Promising == | ==Promising== | ||
Hey. At Wikipedia I was once a welcoming and promising user but first Marcus-E, then Metros and finally Alison teamed up and stole my chances of being famous.([[User:76.247.222.101|76.247.222.101]] 01:20, 7 March 2008 (EST)) | Hey. At Wikipedia I was once a welcoming and promising user but first Marcus-E, then Metros and finally Alison teamed up and stole my chances of being famous.([[User:76.247.222.101|76.247.222.101]] 01:20, 7 March 2008 (EST)) | ||
== Is Wikipedia too big? == | ==Is Wikipedia too big?== | ||
This question is currently posed in the description of this category? Is this something we really want to ask? I'm new here, so correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought the point of WikiIndex was to list wikis, not to comment on them. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 15:10, 4 December 2008 (EST) | This question is currently posed in the description of this category? Is this something we really want to ask? I'm new here, so correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought the point of WikiIndex was to list wikis, not to comment on them. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 15:10, 4 December 2008 (EST) | ||
| Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
: I agree that it seems odd to pose this question here, on a "category" page -- shouldn't most of the text on this page be on some normal "article" page (perhaps [[Wikipedia]]), rather than on this category page? --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 22:22, 4 December 2008 (EST) | : I agree that it seems odd to pose this question here, on a "category" page -- shouldn't most of the text on this page be on some normal "article" page (perhaps [[Wikipedia]]), rather than on this category page? --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 22:22, 4 December 2008 (EST) | ||
::Well, I suppose we could. There doesn't seem to be a "neutral point of view" policy for WikiIndex. However, it seems to me that this would lead to more edit wars like have occurred with the article for [[Conservapedia]]. If we do want to provide subjective commentary, however, I would put it on the talk page, a "/" subpage, or in a separate section of the article. I definitely don't think it belongs here in the category definition. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 16:16, 5 December 2008 (EST) | ::Well, I suppose we could. There doesn't seem to be a "[[:Category:NPOV|neutral point of view]]" policy for WikiIndex. However, it seems to me that this would lead to more edit wars like have occurred with the article for [[Conservapedia]]. If we do want to provide subjective commentary, however, I would put it on the talk page, a "/" subpage, or in a separate section of the article. I definitely don't think it belongs here in the category definition. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 16:16, 5 December 2008 (EST) | ||
==Proposed language renaming== | ==Proposed language renaming== | ||