User talk:MarkDilley: Difference between revisions

→‎Work in Progress: ambiguous pages
(Reply to David Cary, maybe)
(→‎Work in Progress: ambiguous pages)
Line 108: Line 108:


:''I think, for the most part, we have moved many wiki that were in this category to their "proper" namespace. Our policy is to have the WikiIndex page match exactly. (The case of disambiguous pages messes with that, but for now, for those pages that is our best option. ) [[MarkDilley]] ''
:''I think, for the most part, we have moved many wiki that were in this category to their "proper" namespace. Our policy is to have the WikiIndex page match exactly. (The case of disambiguous pages messes with that, but for now, for those pages that is our best option. ) [[MarkDilley]] ''
Back in January, we had an explict wiki_name field in the structured data.  Sometimes this field did not match the WikiIndex PageName for that wiki.  To avoid this kind of redundant data-entry, and ensure these fields were always the same, we changed the structured data.  It didn't occur to me until Mark just pointed it out that this new scheme breaks down for wikis with ambiguous page names because we use[[disambiguation]], which means the WikiIndex page name is by-definition not the same as the name of the wiki.  We can either ignore this or create a new wiki template for ambiguous pages.  Thoughts? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 12:32, 5 June 2006 (EDT)


== altorgwiki ==
== altorgwiki ==
6,456

edits