Bureaucrats, checkuser, Interface administrators, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Suppressors, Administrators
83,693
edits
User talk:Koavf/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
m
Text replacement - "Wiki People" to "Wiki people"
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (Fix red link following article rename) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "Wiki People" to "Wiki people") |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
==Notability of users== | ==Notability of users== | ||
"Are we going to make a page about every wiki user or just someone who has some notability...?" [[:Category:Wiki | "Are we going to make a page about every wiki user or just someone who has some notability...?" [[:Category:Wiki people]] says "this is a list of people who consider themselves to be part of the wiki community and their associations to various Wiki sites". I would say that [[PeterKa]] probably considers himself part of the wiki community. Shall we change that page to say "this is a list of ''notable'' people . . ."? | ||
Either way, another question is, are we going to actually make use of [[Template:Delete]] and invite discussion, or just have [[sysop]]s delete pages summarily? Pages deleted in that manner can be undeleted, but then we have the classic problem that non-sysops are unable to view the page and therefore cannot give very well-informed input about whether undeletion would be a good idea. If we are going to use the template, then sysops will need to periodically close those discussions; that didn't happen with the last round of deletion proposals. They sat there for weeks, so I closed them myself as "keep" or "no consensus" since there was in fact no consensus to delete (hardly anyone saw fit to weigh in on those talk pages). [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 17:19, 17 May 2014 (UTC) | Either way, another question is, are we going to actually make use of [[Template:Delete]] and invite discussion, or just have [[sysop]]s delete pages summarily? Pages deleted in that manner can be undeleted, but then we have the classic problem that non-sysops are unable to view the page and therefore cannot give very well-informed input about whether undeletion would be a good idea. If we are going to use the template, then sysops will need to periodically close those discussions; that didn't happen with the last round of deletion proposals. They sat there for weeks, so I closed them myself as "keep" or "no consensus" since there was in fact no consensus to delete (hardly anyone saw fit to weigh in on those talk pages). [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 17:19, 17 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
==[[MeatballWiki]]== | ==[[MeatballWiki]]== | ||
You once edited it as [[:Category:Locked|Locked]]. Do You know any details about that? I changed it to [[:Category:Dormant|Dormant]] / [[:Category: | You once edited it as [[:Category:Locked|Locked]]. Do You know any details about that? I changed it to [[:Category:Dormant|Dormant]] / [[:Category:Read-only|Read-only]], because the [[:Category:Wiki Edit Mode|Edit mode]] was [[:Category:OpenEdit|OpenEdit]] and Locked is an EditMode basically but no status of any catagory. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 00:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
:'''Locking''' I actually recently e-mailed [[Sunir Shah]] about this and he said that there was a [[spam]] problem that he couldn't resolve, so he just locked the site to stop it. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 01:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC) | :'''Locking''' I actually recently e-mailed [[Sunir Shah]] about this and he said that there was a [[spam]] problem that he couldn't resolve, so he just locked the site to stop it. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 01:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| Line 291: | Line 291: | ||
Now, in case of Y. my edit was: | Now, in case of Y. my edit was: | ||
<nowiki>{{language|en|N}} | <nowiki>{{language|en|N}} | ||
Summary: Please adjust and add as appropriate, see [[Category: | Summary: Please adjust and add as appropriate, see [[Category:English speakers]] and [[Category:Language]].</nowiki> | ||
His user page started English. If that is not his first language, he can change that himself. There is not need whatsoever for You to do anything there. And there is no danger ahead that forces You to take immediate action. But You go over it like fire patrol! The result is, that edit-war like comments are on his user page. This is what You invited without consideration. So, don't call me rude now, accept that You are trigger happy. It's not the first time. It is a consistent pattern of Your behaviour. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 10:55, 20 January 2015 (UTC) | His user page started English. If that is not his first language, he can change that himself. There is not need whatsoever for You to do anything there. And there is no danger ahead that forces You to take immediate action. But You go over it like fire patrol! The result is, that edit-war like comments are on his user page. This is what You invited without consideration. So, don't call me rude now, accept that You are trigger happy. It's not the first time. It is a consistent pattern of Your behaviour. [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 10:55, 20 January 2015 (UTC) | ||