Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,132
edits
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Having run into a bunch of wiki that are no longer with us this year. I started to think that maybe we need a different namespace for wiki that have moved on. So that when people come here and bounce around, they find wiki that are at minimum, online. Also, removing them from all categories would seem prudent. Thoughts? [[MarkDilley]] | Having run into a bunch of wiki that are no longer with us this year. I started to think that maybe we need a different namespace for wiki that have moved on. So that when people come here and bounce around, they find wiki that are at minimum, online. Also, removing them from all categories would seem prudent. Thoughts? [[MarkDilley]] | ||
:The defunct or closed or dead status should make it clear, but we could have some color if the infobox has that kind of status and maybe a headline that says so. As for categories, we definitely could have categories about [topic] assume that they are living and any of them that are dead can be a subclass of [topic]. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 06:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC) | :The defunct or closed or dead status should make it clear, but we could have some color if the infobox has that kind of status and maybe a headline that says so. As for categories, we definitely could have categories about [topic] assume that they are living and any of them that are dead can be a subclass of [topic]. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 06:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC) | ||
Yes, I remember advocating for keeping dead and defunct wiki in the main namespace. Now I am wondering about that decision again, checking out what folks think and appreciate hearing it. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | |||
====2022-07 – wiki engine, source code repo==== | ====2022-07 – wiki engine, source code repo==== |