Category talk:Wiki engine: Difference between revisions

two MediaWiki?
mNo edit summary
(two MediaWiki?)
Line 21: Line 21:


How to handle wiki engines where we find only one wiki using it. Maybe the article page should be added to [[:Category:Wiki Engine]], and we dont bother creating a a category for it? -- [[User:Harry Wood|Harry Wood]] 05:56, 31 Jan 2006 (EST)
How to handle wiki engines where we find only one wiki using it. Maybe the article page should be added to [[:Category:Wiki Engine]], and we dont bother creating a a category for it? -- [[User:Harry Wood|Harry Wood]] 05:56, 31 Jan 2006 (EST)
Yes, that sounds fine.
Alternatively, we could pretend that all those unique wiki engines are all using the same wiki engine. We would name that wiki engine something like "Unique wiki engine".
Or "Unpopular wiki engine", if we wanted to criticize their creativity :-).
--[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 04:18, 5 Feb 2006 (EST)


== Naming of wiki Engines ==
== Naming of wiki Engines ==
Why is it UseModWiki, but OddMuse (not wiki)? [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 11:46, 22 Jan 2006 (EST)
Why is it UseModWiki, but OddMuse (not wiki)? [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 11:46, 22 Jan 2006 (EST)
:Good question Ted. It should probably be just 'UseMod', but that'll take a bit of changing! -- [[User:Harry Wood|Harry Wood]] 05:56, 31 Jan 2006 (EST)
:Good question Ted. It should probably be just 'UseMod', but that'll take a bit of changing! -- [[User:Harry Wood|Harry Wood]] 05:56, 31 Jan 2006 (EST)
== two MediaWiki? ==
The list includes both
* MediaWiki
* MediaWiki?
Do we really need both?
--[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 04:18, 5 Feb 2006 (EST)