6,456
edits
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (→16 down to 4 process: couple of my thoughts) |
(Ted's thoughts) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
* Closed (8) | * Closed (8) | ||
* InvitationOnly (14) | * InvitationOnly (14) | ||
* KeyedAccess (0) ''says to move anything here to the SaveCheck category | * KeyedAccess (0) | ||
** propose '''delete''' ''says to move anything here to the SaveCheck category'' [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> | |||
* LoginToEdit (341) and SupplyAuthorName listed as sub-cat | * LoginToEdit (341) and SupplyAuthorName listed as sub-cat | ||
* Membership (2) | * Membership (2) | ||
** propose LoginToEdit | ** propose '''LoginToEdit''' Mark | ||
* NewPagesOnly (0) | * NewPagesOnly (0) | ||
** propose to | ** propose to '''delete''' Mark | ||
*** agreed: '''delete''' Ted | |||
* OpenEdit (729) | * OpenEdit (729) | ||
* Private (19) | * Private (19) | ||
| Line 43: | Line 45: | ||
* TempEditLock (1) | * TempEditLock (1) | ||
* Unknown (347) | * Unknown (347) | ||
point of view: In my mind OpenEdit is totally clear. LoginToEdit is also clear in that there is no human being deciding who gets access. Anyone can do it. All the others require some kind of human intervention to edit (Membership, Subscription, RequestLogin, etc) [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 16:13, 16 Feb 2006 (EST) | |||
edits