6,456
edits
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (→current: ApprovalRequired --> InviteRequired - same meaning?) |
(→current: Ted's answer and re-organizing) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
=== current === | === current === | ||
* Closed (<s>8</s> 6) | * Closed (<s>8</s> 6) | ||
** propose '''ReadOnly''' Ted | ** propose '''ReadOnly''' Ted | ||
* LoginToEdit (341) and SupplyAuthorName listed as sub-cat | * LoginToEdit (341) and SupplyAuthorName listed as sub-cat | ||
* OpenEdit (729) | * OpenEdit (729) | ||
* Private (19) | * Private (19) | ||
** propose that any wiki tagged as private point to the wiki software project: like on my homepage, instead of pointing to my specific private wiki, I should point to pbwiki.com. [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small> | ** propose that any wiki tagged as private point to the wiki software project: like on my homepage, instead of pointing to my specific private wiki, I should point to pbwiki.com. [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small> | ||
* ReadOnly (23) | * ReadOnly (23) | ||
* SaveCheck (14) | |||
* TempEditLock (1) | |||
* Unknown (347) | |||
* Censored (1) | |||
** propose '''ApprovalRequired''' Ted | |||
* InvitationOnly (14) | |||
** propose '''ApprovalRequired''' Ted | |||
* Membership (2) | |||
* Subscription (1) | |||
** propose '''ApprovalRequired''' Ted | |||
** propose '''LoginToEdit''' Mark | |||
** propose '''ApprovalRequired''' Ted | |||
* RequestLogin (9) | * RequestLogin (9) | ||
** propose '''LoginToEdit''' Mark | ** propose '''LoginToEdit''' Mark | ||
| Line 43: | Line 49: | ||
** propose '''ReadOnly''' Mark | ** propose '''ReadOnly''' Mark | ||
** propose '''ApprovalRequired''' Ted | ** propose '''ApprovalRequired''' Ted | ||
point of view: In my mind OpenEdit is totally clear. LoginToEdit is also clear in that there is no human being deciding who gets access. Anyone can do it. All the others require some kind of human intervention to edit (Membership, Subscription, RequestLogin, etc) [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 16:13, 16 Feb 2006 (EST) | point of view: In my mind OpenEdit is totally clear. LoginToEdit is also clear in that there is no human being deciding who gets access. Anyone can do it. All the others require some kind of human intervention to edit (Membership, Subscription, RequestLogin, etc) [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 16:13, 16 Feb 2006 (EST) | ||
| Line 54: | Line 55: | ||
: Is '''InviteRequired''' saying the same thing as '''ApprovalRequired'''? ApprovalRequired is a little awkward for me... [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small> | : Is '''InviteRequired''' saying the same thing as '''ApprovalRequired'''? ApprovalRequired is a little awkward for me... [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small> | ||
:: No, they're not the same. I've proposed '''ApprovalRequired''' as a replacement for Restricted, Subscription, InvitationRequired, RequestLogin, Censored and Membership because it seems to be a category that encompasses all these others. The actual mechanism of that Approval isn't important to me. If there's another name for this concept, that's fine with me. I just want to group all of those into one. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 00:21, 18 Feb 2006 (EST) | |||
=== deleted === | === deleted === | ||
* ''KeyedAccess (0)'' '''deleted''' | * ''KeyedAccess (0)'' '''deleted''' | ||
* ''NewPagesOnly (0)'' '''deleted''' per Mark & Ted agreement | * ''NewPagesOnly (0)'' '''deleted''' per Mark & Ted agreement | ||
edits