Category talk:Browse: Difference between revisions

No change in size ,  28 January 2008
m
Moved CategoryDiscussions tag back to bottom.
(Category:Should be empty?)
m (Moved CategoryDiscussions tag back to bottom.)
Line 5: Line 5:


: Do you mean in place of '''<nowiki>[[Category:Browse]]</nowiki>'''?  Would you envision that template having any text or just being a shortcut to putting a page in the category?  We have few templates now, like '''add''', '''delete''' and the like, that put a notice on the page as well as categorizing.  We just need to figure out what works best. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:29, 9 Mar 2006 (EST)
: Do you mean in place of '''<nowiki>[[Category:Browse]]</nowiki>'''?  Would you envision that template having any text or just being a shortcut to putting a page in the category?  We have few templates now, like '''add''', '''delete''' and the like, that put a notice on the page as well as categorizing.  We just need to figure out what works best. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:29, 9 Mar 2006 (EST)
{{CategoryDiscussions}}


== Category:Should be empty? ==
== Category:Should be empty? ==


Should there be a “Should be empty” category? For categories such as “[[:Category:New York]]” (see talk on that Category:New York page.) --[[User:EarthFurst|EarthFurst]] 18:51, 28 January 2008 (EST)
Should there be a “Should be empty” category? For categories such as “[[:Category:New York]]” (see talk on that Category:New York page.) --[[User:EarthFurst|EarthFurst]] 18:51, 28 January 2008 (EST)
{{CategoryDiscussions}}