1,317
edits
EarthFurst (talk | contribs) (Category:Should be empty?) |
EarthFurst (talk | contribs) m (Moved CategoryDiscussions tag back to bottom.) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
: Do you mean in place of '''<nowiki>[[Category:Browse]]</nowiki>'''? Would you envision that template having any text or just being a shortcut to putting a page in the category? We have few templates now, like '''add''', '''delete''' and the like, that put a notice on the page as well as categorizing. We just need to figure out what works best. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:29, 9 Mar 2006 (EST) | : Do you mean in place of '''<nowiki>[[Category:Browse]]</nowiki>'''? Would you envision that template having any text or just being a shortcut to putting a page in the category? We have few templates now, like '''add''', '''delete''' and the like, that put a notice on the page as well as categorizing. We just need to figure out what works best. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:29, 9 Mar 2006 (EST) | ||
== Category:Should be empty? == | == Category:Should be empty? == | ||
Should there be a “Should be empty” category? For categories such as “[[:Category:New York]]” (see talk on that Category:New York page.) --[[User:EarthFurst|EarthFurst]] 18:51, 28 January 2008 (EST) | Should there be a “Should be empty” category? For categories such as “[[:Category:New York]]” (see talk on that Category:New York page.) --[[User:EarthFurst|EarthFurst]] 18:51, 28 January 2008 (EST) | ||
{{CategoryDiscussions}} | |||