1,853
edits
Talk:Conservapedia: Difference between revisions
→Lengthy criticisms
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
::I think it's important to note who edits the page to figure out why the criticism section is so long. [[User: Proxima Centauri]] is an active contributer to RationalWiki, as are [[User:Gulik]] and [[User:Barbara Shack]]. [[User:74.215.185.102|74.215.185.102]] 15:29, 13 November 2008 (EST) | ::I think it's important to note who edits the page to figure out why the criticism section is so long. [[User: Proxima Centauri]] is an active contributer to RationalWiki, as are [[User:Gulik]] and [[User:Barbara Shack]]. [[User:74.215.185.102|74.215.185.102]] 15:29, 13 November 2008 (EST) | ||
:::Well, I think it's borderline ridiculous. Link to CP, link to the RW entry on this Index, let the rest speak for itself. I think there is especially no need for ''specific incidents'' to be reported, in detail, on an indexing site. [[User:Fishal|Fishal]] 01:19, 14 November 2008 (EST) | :::Well, I think it's borderline ridiculous. Link to CP, link to the RW entry on this Index, let the rest speak for itself. I think there is especially no need for ''specific incidents'' to be reported, in detail, on an indexing site. [[User:Fishal|Fishal]] 01:19, 14 November 2008 (EST) | ||
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User:Interiot User:Interiot] is a Conservapedian. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 14:41, 15 November 2008 (EST) | [http://www.conservapedia.com/User:Interiot User:Interiot] is a Conservapedian as is [http://www.conservapedia.com/User:Fishal User:Fishal]. I don't know about the bunch of numbers. They pointed out that we're RationalWikians. They didn't point out that they're Conservapedians. That's dishonest. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 14:41, 15 November 2008 (EST) | ||