Talk:The Conservapedia RationalWiki war: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:


::::::::::::I protect ''good'' wikis from vandals.  Conervapedia is mostly worthless in my opinion.  Articles with basic information can help those unfortunate home schooled kids be a bit less ignorant.  I edit those articles constructively and don't vandalize those articles. I think I got to be an admin here because I spent hours and hours reverting vandalism and protecting wikis from vandals on many different wikis.  Notably on [http://www.palaeos.org/Special:RecentChanges?title=Special:RecentChanges&days=30&limit=500&hideminor=0 Palaeos Org] I put a lot of work into preventing page-move vandalism.  You hope an impartial admistrator will mediate in this edit war.  [[Category talk:Active administrators of this wiki#Conservapedia, RationalWiki etc|I’ve alerted the other administrators to the problem]]. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 03:53, 22 November 2008 (EST)
::::::::::::I protect ''good'' wikis from vandals.  Conervapedia is mostly worthless in my opinion.  Articles with basic information can help those unfortunate home schooled kids be a bit less ignorant.  I edit those articles constructively and don't vandalize those articles. I think I got to be an admin here because I spent hours and hours reverting vandalism and protecting wikis from vandals on many different wikis.  Notably on [http://www.palaeos.org/Special:RecentChanges?title=Special:RecentChanges&days=30&limit=500&hideminor=0 Palaeos Org] I put a lot of work into preventing page-move vandalism.  You hope an impartial admistrator will mediate in this edit war.  [[Category talk:Active administrators of this wiki#Conservapedia, RationalWiki etc|I’ve alerted the other administrators to the problem]]. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 03:53, 22 November 2008 (EST)
:::::::::::::See, nobody who says "Conservapedia is mostly worthless in my opinion", in ''my opinion'' should be allowed to basically create and dictate the content of an article about Conservapedia. Do you see a conflict of interest at all here?
:::::::::::::Thank you for finally asking an admin to help. I'd already asked two admins on their talk page, but they haven't responded yet. (I don't really know who's who around here). [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 13:51, 22 November 2008 (EST)


What's this article for? I thought that this was supposed to be an online wiki phonebook, not a place for wikis to criticize each other. This will grow out of control. Someone might try to make a [[Wookieepedia]] vs. [[Star Wars Fanon]] article, an [[Uncyclopedia]] vs. [[Illogicopedia]] article, or even an [[Uncyclopedia]]/ [[Illogicopedia]] vs. [[Wikia]] article. --[[User:Michaeldsuarez|Michaeldsuarez]] 00:03, 16 November 2008 (EST)
What's this article for? I thought that this was supposed to be an online wiki phonebook, not a place for wikis to criticize each other. This will grow out of control. Someone might try to make a [[Wookieepedia]] vs. [[Star Wars Fanon]] article, an [[Uncyclopedia]] vs. [[Illogicopedia]] article, or even an [[Uncyclopedia]]/ [[Illogicopedia]] vs. [[Wikia]] article. --[[User:Michaeldsuarez|Michaeldsuarez]] 00:03, 16 November 2008 (EST)
54

edits

Navigation menu