User talk:Rathbone: Difference between revisions

huh?
(huh?)
Line 81: Line 81:


That's a really good idea, but I'm just not sure of the implementation given that we'd normally categorize that field and if we did so, then we'd have tons of category entries for the articles that in fact have wikinodes.  It would seem that there should be some solution tho. --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 20:57, 25 Feb 2006 (EST)
That's a really good idea, but I'm just not sure of the implementation given that we'd normally categorize that field and if we did so, then we'd have tons of category entries for the articles that in fact have wikinodes.  It would seem that there should be some solution tho. --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 20:57, 25 Feb 2006 (EST)
== huh? ==
Sorry :-( - didn't understand the reply.  [[FutureLink]] is usually for internal wiki actions.  But FutureLinking the web is cool!  Like [http://wikinodes.wiki.taoriver.net/moin.cgi/WikiBardo WikiBardo].  (moving this stuff to proposals.) [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small>
Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,160

edits