Conservapedia: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
6 bytes added ,  20 December 2008
(clearly this is not true; Rationalwikians periodically brag about how their intentional parody from days, weeks, and months ago is still there)
Line 35: Line 35:
* Be wary of an abundant use of <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> tags on articles, especially if you could add the citations yourself. This practice is often viewed as "ideologically-motivated tagging", and is frowned upon on Conservapedia.
* Be wary of an abundant use of <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> tags on articles, especially if you could add the citations yourself. This practice is often viewed as "ideologically-motivated tagging", and is frowned upon on Conservapedia.
* Conservapedia is a conservative, creationist encyclopedia. As such, it is best not to post anything that might be construed as "liberally biased" or "pro-evolution".
* Conservapedia is a conservative, creationist encyclopedia. As such, it is best not to post anything that might be construed as "liberally biased" or "pro-evolution".
* If you get blocked for any of these reasons and you think the block was unfair, do not create a new account. Instead, email the administrator or user who blocked you and appeal for a second chance. Most users (especially those who did not know they did anything wrong) are granted leniency and are allowed to edit again.
* If you get blocked for any of these reasons and you think the block was unfair, '''do not''' create a new account. Instead, email the administrator or user who blocked you and appeal for a second chance. Most users (especially those who did not know they did anything wrong) are granted leniency and are allowed to edit again.


==See also==
==See also==

Navigation menu