Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,132
edits
(→CamelCase: yes, and for non-articles) |
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (→CamelCase: for internal to this wiki standards, I think is what is meant by the discussion, Wiki name pages are not in question) |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
For Meatball, there's no debate, I think. If it were called Meatball Wiki, then our page would be [[Meatball Wiki]]. It's clear, yes? But what about guidelines and other meta pages? Are we using namespaces for them? Are we using camel case or something else? [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 17:34, 18 Jan 2006 (EST) | For Meatball, there's no debate, I think. If it were called Meatball Wiki, then our page would be [[Meatball Wiki]]. It's clear, yes? But what about guidelines and other meta pages? Are we using namespaces for them? Are we using camel case or something else? [[User:TedErnst|TedErnst]] 17:34, 18 Jan 2006 (EST) | ||
Trying to clarify, we are currently using both [[CamelCase]] and [[Free Links]] for our internal wiki page names. This is because: | |||
* We have not decided one way or the other about what a standard would be. | |||
* Because I think it is important to be open to the way people use wiki, not to clamp down on any side. [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]] |