1,136
edits
Line 165: | Line 165: | ||
:::(Proxima is a sysop here.) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:02, 2 September 2009 (EDT) | :::(Proxima is a sysop here.) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:02, 2 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::I propose that critical articles may contain rebuttals to criticisms. ([[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:33, 31 August 2009 (EDT)) | :::I propose that critical articles may contain rebuttals to criticisms. ([[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:33, 31 August 2009 (EDT)) | ||
:::MarkDilly seems to be the most (or only) active bureaucrat, [[Category_talk:Active_administrators_of_this_wiki#Conservapedia.2C_RationalWiki_etc|in one example | :::MarkDilly seems to be the most (or only) active bureaucrat, [[Category_talk:Active_administrators_of_this_wiki#Conservapedia.2C_RationalWiki_etc|in one example he suggested a criticism page that was called "Constructive"]]. | ||
::::I don't think the term "Constructive" is necessary, but I think we should define "constructive" according to our policies on notability, verifiability, and/or something to do with preventing harm. It might not be a bad way of suggesting it however. I'd support either. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:02, 2 September 2009 (EDT) | ::::I don't think the term "Constructive" is necessary, but I think we should define "constructive" according to our policies on notability, verifiability, and/or something to do with preventing harm. It might not be a bad way of suggesting it however. I'd support either. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:02, 2 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::I appreciate the restraint and professionalism that everyone is displaying here. I'd just like everyone to know that I'm not gonna post some witty statement like "BWAM", because that is not the purpose of this policy page. :-) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:02, 2 September 2009 (EDT) | ::::I appreciate the restraint and professionalism that everyone is displaying here. I'd just like everyone to know that I'm not gonna post some witty statement like "BWAM", because that is not the purpose of this policy page. :-) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:02, 2 September 2009 (EDT) |
edits