1,136
edits
Line 151: | Line 151: | ||
*Attempt a [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Npov Neutral Point of View] for articles. | *Attempt a [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Npov Neutral Point of View] for articles. | ||
*Attempt a [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Npov Neutral Point of View] for articles but allow a section for "critical" viewpoints. | *Attempt a [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Npov Neutral Point of View] for articles but allow a section for "critical" viewpoints. | ||
*Have separate articles for sympathetic and critical viewpoints. Anyone would be able to create the critical article for any wiki, if they have a grievance or negative review, | *Have separate articles for sympathetic and critical viewpoints. Anyone would be able to create the critical article for any wiki, if they have a grievance or negative review | ||
* | |||
* | But, critical or not, '''all articles shall be restrained''' by the policies on: | ||
* | *Notability | ||
* | *Verifiability | ||
*Constructiveness (so any criticism must be written in a way that it is suggesting what they could do better) (per [[Category_talk:Active_administrators_of_this_wiki#Conservapedia.2C_RationalWiki_etc|bureaucrat MarkDilly's suggestion]]) | |||
*Not "harmful" in some sense (per [[WikiIndex_talk:Blocking_Policy#draft_blocking_policy_proposal|sysop DavidCary's proposal]], although he was only suggesting this "to protect WikiIndex and its editors", I ([[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]]) think this should be extended to everyone.) | |||
Are the articles on wikis to be sympathetic, critical, both, or "neutral"? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] | Are the articles on wikis to be sympathetic, critical, both, or "neutral"? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] |
edits