60
edits
User talk:Lumenos: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Reordering talk page comments
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
:::''So I moved comments he had made before that to a section with a name that appeared more like uuh did I mention that he was going on about "snarkiness", and how fun it is. Oh yeah, topic headings could always be renamed, no problem. Then it was "lol" in the edit history description, you know, like '''''as if''''' to say, "yea for that edit!" or "more like that please!" Which was basically what he meant. Okay so I think it is all fairly clear now who was behind all this. All I'm saying is just be careful with this guy.'' [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:36, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | :::''So I moved comments he had made before that to a section with a name that appeared more like uuh did I mention that he was going on about "snarkiness", and how fun it is. Oh yeah, topic headings could always be renamed, no problem. Then it was "lol" in the edit history description, you know, like '''''as if''''' to say, "yea for that edit!" or "more like that please!" Which was basically what he meant. Okay so I think it is all fairly clear now who was behind all this. All I'm saying is just be careful with this guy.'' [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:36, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::Facepalm.jpg [[User:Nx|Nx]] 13:41, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ::::Facepalm.jpg [[User:Nx|Nx]] 13:41, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::I'd just like to add that the re-ordering of comments does not help one little bit. Especially when it generates a little sub-debate on the same talk page about whether the re-ordering was a good idea.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 10:18, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
== Writing policies and facilitating consensus == | == Writing policies and facilitating consensus == | ||