Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,132
edits
WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines (view source)
Revision as of 04:26, 4 September 2009
, 4 September 2009→Enforcement against editors: warning tags are too strong
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) m (add RightTOC move categories down to bottom of page) |
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (→Enforcement against editors: warning tags are too strong) |
||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
**'''Etiquette:''' Guide to help polite people to be polite. Does not imply any enforcement. (You may edit this page.) | **'''Etiquette:''' Guide to help polite people to be polite. Does not imply any enforcement. (You may edit this page.) | ||
** '''Tag:''' Placing "warning tags" on info that is dubious, impolite, etc. What categories of info warrants this? You could alternatively change the information (without deleting or reverting). | ** '''Tag:''' Placing "warning tags" on info that is dubious, impolite, etc. What categories of info warrants this? You could alternatively change the information (without deleting or reverting). | ||
*** Warning tags are too strong - I like the idea of tags and think they should point to constructive information. ~~ [[MarkDilley]] | |||
** '''Eventual deletion:''' What categories of info should be deleted eventually, if the warning tags are ignored? | ** '''Eventual deletion:''' What categories of info should be deleted eventually, if the warning tags are ignored? | ||
** '''Request or alert:''' Tell the violator of the policy about your perception and reasoning. This could be done on their talk page or on the talk page of articles. | ** '''Request or alert:''' Tell the violator of the policy about your perception and reasoning. This could be done on their talk page or on the talk page of articles. | ||