1,136
edits
Huw Powell (talk | contribs) |
(Deleting nearly everything from the Lumeniki article) |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
:Fine. You can be Prime Minister. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 15:05, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | :Fine. You can be Prime Minister. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 15:05, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::Seconded. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 02:29, 4 September 2009 (EDT) | ::Seconded. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 02:29, 4 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
== Deleting nearly everything from the Lumeniki article == | |||
[http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Lumeniki&diff=69874&oldid=68851 16:45, 30 August 2009 Phantom Hoover (Talk | contribs) (1,102 bytes) (Prune. With a chainsaw)]] | |||
:Thank you for expressing an interest in [[Lumeniki]]. This wiki clearly did not belong in "[[:Category:Catholic]]" because that would just be confusing and disorderly for those searching here for their gosh. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 04:44, 4 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
==Helping develop policy== | |||
I wonder if you might help us develop some inclusion/exclusion policies. Perhaps you would be a good judge of what info is [[WikiIndex:Policies_and_Guidelines#Notability|notable]] enough to include in a wiki article. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 04:44, 4 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
What should constitute an offense worthy of a block? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 04:44, 4 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
How do you feel about DavidCary proposal to adopt [[Wikipedia:Block#Protection Wikipedia's block policy]]? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 04:44, 4 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
:Is blocking even practical at all given your knowledge of the internets and associated technologies. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 04:44, 4 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
edits