1,136
edits
m (→Enforcement against editors: cosmetics) |
|||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
All policies should denote what type of enforcement is appropriate for the policy. Here are some suggested "categories of enforcement" against editor's violations of policy: | All policies should denote what type of enforcement is appropriate for the policy. Here are some suggested "categories of enforcement" against editor's violations of policy: | ||
*(Editor's powers): | *(Editor's powers): | ||
:*'''Edit sparing:''' Some wikis consider it "edit waring" and baaaad to undo edits. Lumenos suggest Wikipedias "three revert rule", as a matter of etiquette. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 03:41, 6 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
:*'''Etiquette:''' Guide to help polite people to be polite. Does not imply any enforcement. (You may edit this page.) | |||
:* '''Tag:''' Placing <del>"warning tags"</del> on info that is dubious, impolite, etc. What categories of info warrants this? You could alternatively change the information (without deleting or reverting). ~~ [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] | |||
::* Warning tags are too strong - I like the idea of tags and think they should point to constructive information. ~~ [[MarkDilley]] | |||
::* I agree. ~~ [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] | :::* I agree. ~~ [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] | ||
:* '''Eventual deletion:''' What categories of info should be deleted eventually, if the warning tags are ignored? | |||
:* '''Request or alert:''' Tell the violator of the policy about your perception and reasoning. This could be done on their talk page or on the talk page of articles. | |||
:* '''Speedy deletion''' | |||
*(Administrative powers): | *(Administrative powers): | ||
** '''Oversite:''' A term that means the information will be completely vaporized! Well almost. | ** '''Oversite:''' A term that means the information will be completely vaporized! Well almost. |
edits