2,368
edits
Category talk:New: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
New Wikis, which therefore are [[:Category:Inactive|inactive]]. | |||
: Please explain why you think that? Best, [[MarkDilley]] | |||
::I was just looking for a category like this. A wiki that's just gone live with no content, waiting to be discovered by users would go right in the "Active" category, but there's actually very little activity going on there yet. Therefore, this category. — <span style="font-family: Kristen ITC, Times New Roman;">[[User:Sean Fennel]][[User talk:Sean Fennel|@]]</span> 21:07, 25 September 2006 (EDT) | |||
::: Yes, I agree that a "new" category might be useful, for wiki that have very little activity because they were started very recently. I wouldn't say new wiki are "inactive", because here at WikiIndex we've re-defined that word to mean [[:Category:Inactive]], URLs that once led to a wiki, but now do not (neither one of which are true of new wiki). | |||
::: On the other hand, I wouldn't be too upset if someone decided there are too many {{tag|Wiki Status}} categories, and decided to merge "New" with "Active" ("in use and not overrun by spam"). --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 18:20, 27 February 2007 (PST) | |||
==When is a wiki's status no longer New?== | ==When is a wiki's status no longer New?== | ||
When is a wiki's status no longer New? When it is three months old? Seven months old? --[[User:EarthFurst|EarthFurst]] 19:45, 24 October 2009 (EDT) | When is a wiki's status no longer New? When it is three months old? Seven months old? --[[User:EarthFurst|EarthFurst]] 19:45, 24 October 2009 (EDT) | ||