Bureaucrats, checkuser, Interface administrators, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Suppressors, Administrators
83,693
edits
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (→Do you like it raw?: added reply) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (→"good pages" for MediaWikis: added reply) |
||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
: --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 00:03, 21 April 2009 (EDT) | : --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 00:03, 21 April 2009 (EDT) | ||
:: I think the problem is, that, MediaWiki-based wikis are discriminated a little by doing so. Ok, the value ''All Pages'' is much too high indeed - because Images and Categories can be very poor in information. Let's keep that in mind. It seems to be a good deal to support two MediaWiki-specific property names within the to-do new [[template:wiki]]: <code>mw_good_pages</code> and <code>mw_total_pages</code>, displaing both values and autocategorizing only by the first one. --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 04:06, 21 April 2009 (EDT) | :: I think the problem is, that, MediaWiki-based wikis are discriminated a little by doing so. Ok, the value ''All Pages'' is much too high indeed - because Images and Categories can be very poor in information. Let's keep that in mind. It seems to be a good deal to support two MediaWiki-specific property names within the to-do new [[template:wiki]]: <code>mw_good_pages</code> and <code>mw_total_pages</code>, displaing both values and autocategorizing only by the first one. --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 04:06, 21 April 2009 (EDT) | ||
The easiest 'answer' to this issue is to add some 'hidden text' into the size template – something like <code><nowiki><!-- use only the smaller 'legitimate content pages' number, and NOT the larger 'total pages in the database' number --></nowiki></code>. Rgds, [[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 04:29, 21 June 2011 (PDT) | |||
== as of == | == as of == | ||
I'd suggest a new parameter for smart time stamping. This can be done unsing a template with the subst-syntax. Please have a look at {{Template|now}}. Regards --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 04:10, 12 November 2009 (EST) | I'd suggest a new parameter for smart time stamping. This can be done unsing a template with the subst-syntax. Please have a look at {{Template|now}}. Regards --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 04:10, 12 November 2009 (EST) | ||
edits