5,637
edits
User talk:Elassint: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→rocking work on spam patrolling: Extensions? Blacklists?
(→rocking work on spam patrolling: Extensions? Blacklists?) |
|||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
: I posted a possible fix for this on Mark's talk page. It would require a CAPTCHA for any edit, with a link or not. However, if I understand correctly, it would only require it once. It's not a fix-all solution, but it might stop this bot at least. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 13:10, 7 September 2011 (PDT) | : I posted a possible fix for this on Mark's talk page. It would require a CAPTCHA for any edit, with a link or not. However, if I understand correctly, it would only require it once. It's not a fix-all solution, but it might stop this bot at least. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 13:10, 7 September 2011 (PDT) | ||
::At present only Werdna's [[mw:Extension:AbuseFilter|Extension:AbuseFilter]] or [[mw:Extension:Bad Behavior|Extension:Bad Behavior]] seem like valid options..--[[User:Comets|Comets]] 20:51, 7 September 2011 (PDT) | ::At present only Werdna's [[mw:Extension:AbuseFilter|Extension:AbuseFilter]] or [[mw:Extension:Bad Behavior|Extension:Bad Behavior]] seem like valid options..--[[User:Comets|Comets]] 20:51, 7 September 2011 (PDT) | ||
:I'd support either. I'm sure that Elassint and Tera S have better things to do with their time. I'd support using a blacklist, if we could find one. Googling these IPs, I can see that they've been used several times before, so I would imagine that there is a blacklist out there somewhere that includes them. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 15:56, 8 September 2011 (PDT) | |||