User:Leucosticte/Inclupedia: Difference between revisions
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (add logo) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|license=Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike | |license=Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike | ||
|maintopic=General | |maintopic=General | ||
|logo=[[File:Inclupedia.png|135px]] | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Size | {{Size | ||
Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
The idea of the project was first conceived circa 19 March 2008. At that time, the working name was SpiritWorldWiki, a reference to the idea that there might be more than two places articles could go (good articles going to heaven (Wikipedia) and bad articles going to hell (deletion); SpiritWorldWiki could be a destination for articles that are neither good enough for the [[wikipedia:Celestial Kingdom|Celestial Kingdom]] (Wikipedia) nor bad enough for the [[wikipedia:Telestial Kingdom|Telestial Kingdom]] (deletion), but rather could go to the [[wikipedia:Spirit world (Latter Day Saints)|Spirit World]] (SpiritWorldWiki) while awaiting their final destination. Some might end up in the [[wikipedia:Terrestrial Kingdom|Terrestrial Kingdom]] (i.e. an Inclupedia-like wiki). The analogy was, however, considered too confusing to be useful.[https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:The_Unknown_Rebel/SpiritWorldWiki] | The idea of the project was first conceived circa 19 March 2008. At that time, the working name was SpiritWorldWiki, a reference to the idea that there might be more than two places articles could go (good articles going to heaven (Wikipedia) and bad articles going to hell (deletion); SpiritWorldWiki could be a destination for articles that are neither good enough for the [[wikipedia:Celestial Kingdom|Celestial Kingdom]] (Wikipedia) nor bad enough for the [[wikipedia:Telestial Kingdom|Telestial Kingdom]] (deletion), but rather could go to the [[wikipedia:Spirit world (Latter Day Saints)|Spirit World]] (SpiritWorldWiki) while awaiting their final destination. Some might end up in the [[wikipedia:Terrestrial Kingdom|Terrestrial Kingdom]] (i.e. an Inclupedia-like wiki). The analogy was, however, considered too confusing to be useful.[https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:The_Unknown_Rebel/SpiritWorldWiki] | ||
Later, the working name was changed to "Wikuna Matata", a reference to the phrase "[[wikipedia:hakuna matata|hakuna matata]]", which means "without worries." This was a reference to the fact that users would have more freedom to create pages without needing to worry that they would be deleted. The name "Inclupedia" was chosen in mid-2010 | Later, the working name was changed to "Wikuna Matata", a reference to the phrase "[[wikipedia:hakuna matata|hakuna matata]]", which means "without worries." This was a reference to the fact that users would have more freedom to create pages without needing to worry that they would be deleted. The name "Inclupedia" was chosen in mid-2010. | ||
Inclupedia has been in [[wikipedia:development hell|development hell]] since the idea's inception. Vain attempts were made to get [[Wikimedia]] interested by posting the proposal to [[Meta-Wiki]] on 14 July 2010 and to the English Wikipedia idea lab on 26 July 2010.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28idea_lab%29/Archive_2#Inclupedia] Then naive attempts were made to solicit paid developer involvement for ridiculously small sums, by means of [[wikipedia:Open-source bounty|open-source bounties]] that would have been worthy of listing at [http://whartoniteseekscodemonkey.tumblr.com/ Whartonite Seeks Code Monkey], except that they were never brought to WSCM's attention. | Inclupedia has been in [[wikipedia:development hell|development hell]] since the idea's inception. Vain attempts were made to get [[Wikimedia]] interested by posting the proposal to [[Meta-Wiki]] on 14 July 2010 and to the English Wikipedia idea lab on 26 July 2010.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28idea_lab%29/Archive_2#Inclupedia] Then naive attempts were made to solicit paid developer involvement for ridiculously small sums, by means of [[wikipedia:Open-source bounty|open-source bounties]] that would have been worthy of listing at [http://whartoniteseekscodemonkey.tumblr.com/ Whartonite Seeks Code Monkey], except that they were never brought to WSCM's attention. | ||
Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
Next, legal problems delayed Inclupedia's progress from 11 December 2008 to 9 February 2010. Development began on MirrorTools on 8 July 2010. Legal problems again delayed Inclupedia development from 11 August 2010 to 12 June 2012. Development resumed on 29 August 2012, but then legal problems delayed Inclupedia development from 3 December 2012 to 2 October 2013. A futile attempt to recruit additional developers from the [[wikitech]] community was made on 13 January 2014. | Next, legal problems delayed Inclupedia's progress from 11 December 2008 to 9 February 2010. Development began on MirrorTools on 8 July 2010. Legal problems again delayed Inclupedia development from 11 August 2010 to 12 June 2012. Development resumed on 29 August 2012, but then legal problems delayed Inclupedia development from 3 December 2012 to 2 October 2013. A futile attempt to recruit additional developers from the [[wikitech]] community was made on 13 January 2014. | ||
Development resumed on 23 January 2014. The development process has thus far spawned many abandoned development branches that resulted in complete code rewritings, as various approaches were found to be ill-conceived or unworkable. | Development resumed on 23 January 2014. The development process has thus far spawned many abandoned development branches that resulted in complete code rewritings, as various approaches were found to be ill-conceived or unworkable. On 29 January 2014, Larson noted, "This Inclupedia programming is like wandering through a really complicated maze with just a notepad with which to keep track of all the dead ends, and having to keep retracing my steps and starting over. It definitely takes a long time to get to that satisfying point at which I can run it and see it work. The part I dread the most is still ahead, though — debugging any database inconsistencies that might arise due to glitchy code. Hopefully I can catch all of those before production deployment, but who knows." | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*[[mw:Inclupedia]] | *[[mw:Inclupedia]] |
Revision as of 11:18, 29 January 2014
Inclupedia [{{{recentchanges URL}}} Recent changes] [No WikiNode] [No About] [No Mobile URL] | |
Founded by: | |
Status: | In preparation |
Language: | Multilingual |
Edit mode: | OpenEdit |
Wiki engine: | MediaWiki |
Wiki license: | Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike"Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike" is not in the list (Custom license, Attribution to contributing authors, Copyright to contributing authors, Site retains copyright, WTFPL, Licence Art Libre, Open Content License, Apache License, BSD Documentation License, FreeBSD Documentation License, ...) of allowed values for the "Wiki license" property. |
Main topic: | General |
Wiki size: | 0 article pages |
Inclupedia aspires to be the largest, most inclusive wiki encyclopedia in the world. It is envisaged as a combination mirror of, and supplement to, Wikipedia.[1] The lead developer of this project is Nathan Larson. The URL http://inclupedia.org currently redirects to the coordination wiki for this project (and other Inclumedia projects), Meta-Inclu.
There was, during 2010, an almost completely empty placeholder wiki at that URL. It had an uppercase letter "I" as its logo. As it had little or no content, no attempt was made to move the wiki when Inclumedia migrated to another webhost.
History
The idea of the project was first conceived circa 19 March 2008. At that time, the working name was SpiritWorldWiki, a reference to the idea that there might be more than two places articles could go (good articles going to heaven (Wikipedia) and bad articles going to hell (deletion); SpiritWorldWiki could be a destination for articles that are neither good enough for the Celestial Kingdom (Wikipedia) nor bad enough for the Telestial Kingdom (deletion), but rather could go to the Spirit World (SpiritWorldWiki) while awaiting their final destination. Some might end up in the Terrestrial Kingdom (i.e. an Inclupedia-like wiki). The analogy was, however, considered too confusing to be useful.[2]
Later, the working name was changed to "Wikuna Matata", a reference to the phrase "hakuna matata", which means "without worries." This was a reference to the fact that users would have more freedom to create pages without needing to worry that they would be deleted. The name "Inclupedia" was chosen in mid-2010.
Inclupedia has been in development hell since the idea's inception. Vain attempts were made to get Wikimedia interested by posting the proposal to Meta-Wiki on 14 July 2010 and to the English Wikipedia idea lab on 26 July 2010.[3] Then naive attempts were made to solicit paid developer involvement for ridiculously small sums, by means of open-source bounties that would have been worthy of listing at Whartonite Seeks Code Monkey, except that they were never brought to WSCM's attention.
Next, legal problems delayed Inclupedia's progress from 11 December 2008 to 9 February 2010. Development began on MirrorTools on 8 July 2010. Legal problems again delayed Inclupedia development from 11 August 2010 to 12 June 2012. Development resumed on 29 August 2012, but then legal problems delayed Inclupedia development from 3 December 2012 to 2 October 2013. A futile attempt to recruit additional developers from the wikitech community was made on 13 January 2014.
Development resumed on 23 January 2014. The development process has thus far spawned many abandoned development branches that resulted in complete code rewritings, as various approaches were found to be ill-conceived or unworkable. On 29 January 2014, Larson noted, "This Inclupedia programming is like wandering through a really complicated maze with just a notepad with which to keep track of all the dead ends, and having to keep retracing my steps and starting over. It definitely takes a long time to get to that satisfying point at which I can run it and see it work. The part I dread the most is still ahead, though — debugging any database inconsistencies that might arise due to glitchy code. Hopefully I can catch all of those before production deployment, but who knows."