Spam blacklist: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Template:Mw, Template:Wp, fix dab, ;''External links *{{Mw|Manual: Combating spam}} — at MediaWiki.org)
m (Text replacement - "Category:WikiIdea" to "Category:Wiki idea")
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
;''See also
;''See also
*[[MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist]] — our WikiIndex spam blacklist, and the default blacklist for all [[:Category:MediaWiki|MediaWiki]] installations which use a spam blacklist
*[[MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist]] — our WikiIndex spam blacklist, and the default blacklist for all [[:Category:MediaWiki|MediaWiki]] installations which use a spam blacklist
*[[My spam blacklist]] — the original WikiIndex local blacklist page, retained for historical reference


;''External links
;''External links
Line 10: Line 11:


[[Category:MediaWiki| ]]
[[Category:MediaWiki| ]]
[[Category:WikiIdea]]
[[Category:Wiki idea]]
[[Category:SpamFighting]]
[[Category:SpamFighting]]

Latest revision as of 16:21, 5 January 2023

The spam blacklist is a list of sites deemed spammy or otherwise objectionable – whose URLs are blocked from being added to wiki article pages by Extension:SpamBlacklist, currently in use on more than 2,000 MediaWiki installations, as listed here on WikiApiary. That extension is usually configured to pull its data from Wikimedia Meta-Wiki's spam blacklist page, found here. That blacklist contains a number of sites, such as Metapedia, that are blocked for political incorrectness rather than spamminess. Some sites, such as examiner.com, are blocked because they are considered unreliable sources that users should be prevented from adding to articles. Link shorteners such as TinyUrl are also blocked, since they could be used to work around the other spam blacklist restrictions.

It is questionable how effective this spam blacklist is at keeping spam off of third-party wikis. Some spam might be targeted only at Wikimedia Foundation wikis, or only at third-party wikis, which would make the list of little help to said third-party wikis. Also, some third-party wikis might prefer that users be allowed to cite sources that are not considered reliable on Wikipedia. Users may not always realize that, when a link is rejected as spammy, it does not necessarily mean that the individual wiki he is editing has specifically chosen to ban that URL.

See also
External links