WikiIndex:Administrators: Difference between revisions
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (See this page for a list of WikiIndex sysop (Administrator) members.) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (As of June 2024, WikiIndex has seventeen (17) administrators, although only one or two of them are active on a daily or regular basis. The full list of WikiIndex administrators can be found here.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''WikiIndex:Administrators''' is fundamentally the first {{tag|user group}} into which a regular [[wiki]] editor here on {{tag|WikiIndex}} is 'promoted' into (rather than being auto-included by way of default or number of [[edit]]s). | '''WikiIndex: Administrators''' is fundamentally the first {{tag|user group}} into which a regular [[wiki]] site editor here on {{tag|WikiIndex}} is 'promoted' into (rather than being auto-included by way of default or number of [[edit]]s). | ||
[[Administrator]]s, frequently shortened to 'admins', and commonly also known as [[sysop]]s, are usually trusted {{tag | [[Administrator]]s, frequently shortened to 'admins', and commonly also known as [[sysop]]s, are usually trusted {{tag|wiki people}} who have been invited to take on more specific roles within the day-to-day operation of the [[WhatIsWiki|wiki]] site. Some [[User|people]] may sometimes volunteer their services by requesting to become an administrator, whereas others prefer to wait to be invited. Whichever method is adopted, the element of trust is a fundamentally important attribute of a good admin, because admins are able to exercise a significant degree of control over the regular [[editor]] folks. One of the most powerful roles of a wiki administrator is to remove the editing rights of another person on the wiki, by way of [[block]]ing, which is clearly a drastic, though sometimes needed action. In reality, on a well-run and harmonious [[wiki community]], with a core of constructive editors who work well within the scope or aims of a wiki site, administrators will often find they have little or no 'administrative' actions to undertake on a daily basis. In these instances, administrators will find they generally carry out 'housekeeping' duties, such as deleting [[spam]], moving (renaming) pages to a name which is already in existence (typically they already exist as a [[redirect]]), protecting pages which appear to be the target of repeated spamming or [[vandal]]ism, or sadly protecting pages which are the subject of an [[edit war]]! Arguably, the best wiki administrators are those who still continue to the fundamental core aims of a wiki site, in being a regular editor, contributor, and in general, just being 'A N Other' member of the wiki editing community. | ||
Due to the nature of the privileges which administrators enjoy, along with the fact they have been deemed to be trustworthy enough to have been awarded the role in the first place, administrators are often seen as, and used as figures of authority. Indeed, administrators are usually called upon to assist in resolving any conflicts, disagreements, [[edit war]]s, and the likes between other people on the wiki. Administrators will often be required to mediate, offer advice and direction, provide empathy, clarity and assistance in the compliance, or lack of, established community [[WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines|policies]] and [[:Category:Guidelines|guidelines]]. And it will usually be one or more administrators who are required to form the definitive answer in such issues, ideally whilst providing concessions to appease any seemingly aggrieved party. When areas of policy or guidelines are found to be lacking, or maybe existent but defective, administrators are usually expected to help in the development and / or improvement in these areas. | Due to the nature of the privileges which administrators enjoy, along with the fact they have been deemed to be trustworthy enough to have been awarded the role in the first place, administrators are often seen as, and used as figures of authority. Indeed, administrators are usually called upon to assist in resolving any conflicts, disagreements, [[edit war]]s, and the likes between other people on the wiki site. Administrators will often be required to mediate, offer advice and direction, provide empathy, clarity and assistance in the compliance, or lack of, established community [[WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines|policies]] and [[:Category:Guidelines|guidelines]]. And it will usually be one or more administrators who are required to form the definitive answer in such issues, ideally whilst providing concessions to appease any seemingly aggrieved party. When areas of policy or guidelines are found to be lacking, or maybe existent but defective, administrators are usually expected to help in the development and / or improvement in these areas. | ||
Being an administrator can be a thankless task, though. And sadly, as in all walks of society and life in general, there can occasionally be found isolated individuals or fringe groups who enjoy the disruptive, and even malicious provocation of authority figures, and | Being an administrator can be a thankless task, though. And sadly, as in all walks of society and life in general, there can occasionally be found isolated individuals or fringe groups who enjoy the disruptive, and even malicious provocation of authority figures, and wiki sites are no exception. Wiki administrators have been on the receiving end of such disruptive figures or individuals, including here on [[WikiIndex]]. When a wiki site is developed around a community of trust and harmony, and is then needlessly attacked; irrespective of the method, it is both the regular folks of the wiki site who are likely to be aggrieved, and in turn, those regular users will typically seek the aid of an administrator to take swift and decisive action. That said administrator is then at threat of being a prime target. Any kind of disruptive behaviour, especially on a wiki site which relies on constructive cooperation, is generally always frowned upon. But it is particularly ''verboten'' to direct or target attacks directly at an admin. If these attacks continue to be targeted towards a specific admin, then not only can things get very messy, any prompt action to curb such disruption by said admin might be circumvented by the aggressor, and could ultimately destroy a previously harmonious wiki site. | ||
As of June 2024, [[WikiIndex]] has seventeen (17) administrators, although only one or two of them are active on a daily or regular basis. The full list of WikiIndex administrators can be found [[Special:ListUsers/sysop|here]]. | |||
;''See also | ;''See also | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
*[[WikiIndex:Users]] | *[[WikiIndex:Users]] | ||
[[Category:Wiki | [[Category:Wiki people|*]] | ||
[[Category:Admin| ]] | [[Category:Admin| ]] | ||
Latest revision as of 22:32, 31 May 2024
WikiIndex: Administrators is fundamentally the first user group into which a regular wiki site editor here on WikiIndex is 'promoted' into (rather than being auto-included by way of default or number of edits).
Administrators, frequently shortened to 'admins', and commonly also known as sysops, are usually trusted wiki people who have been invited to take on more specific roles within the day-to-day operation of the wiki site. Some people may sometimes volunteer their services by requesting to become an administrator, whereas others prefer to wait to be invited. Whichever method is adopted, the element of trust is a fundamentally important attribute of a good admin, because admins are able to exercise a significant degree of control over the regular editor folks. One of the most powerful roles of a wiki administrator is to remove the editing rights of another person on the wiki, by way of blocking, which is clearly a drastic, though sometimes needed action. In reality, on a well-run and harmonious wiki community, with a core of constructive editors who work well within the scope or aims of a wiki site, administrators will often find they have little or no 'administrative' actions to undertake on a daily basis. In these instances, administrators will find they generally carry out 'housekeeping' duties, such as deleting spam, moving (renaming) pages to a name which is already in existence (typically they already exist as a redirect), protecting pages which appear to be the target of repeated spamming or vandalism, or sadly protecting pages which are the subject of an edit war! Arguably, the best wiki administrators are those who still continue to the fundamental core aims of a wiki site, in being a regular editor, contributor, and in general, just being 'A N Other' member of the wiki editing community.
Due to the nature of the privileges which administrators enjoy, along with the fact they have been deemed to be trustworthy enough to have been awarded the role in the first place, administrators are often seen as, and used as figures of authority. Indeed, administrators are usually called upon to assist in resolving any conflicts, disagreements, edit wars, and the likes between other people on the wiki site. Administrators will often be required to mediate, offer advice and direction, provide empathy, clarity and assistance in the compliance, or lack of, established community policies and guidelines. And it will usually be one or more administrators who are required to form the definitive answer in such issues, ideally whilst providing concessions to appease any seemingly aggrieved party. When areas of policy or guidelines are found to be lacking, or maybe existent but defective, administrators are usually expected to help in the development and / or improvement in these areas.
Being an administrator can be a thankless task, though. And sadly, as in all walks of society and life in general, there can occasionally be found isolated individuals or fringe groups who enjoy the disruptive, and even malicious provocation of authority figures, and wiki sites are no exception. Wiki administrators have been on the receiving end of such disruptive figures or individuals, including here on WikiIndex. When a wiki site is developed around a community of trust and harmony, and is then needlessly attacked; irrespective of the method, it is both the regular folks of the wiki site who are likely to be aggrieved, and in turn, those regular users will typically seek the aid of an administrator to take swift and decisive action. That said administrator is then at threat of being a prime target. Any kind of disruptive behaviour, especially on a wiki site which relies on constructive cooperation, is generally always frowned upon. But it is particularly verboten to direct or target attacks directly at an admin. If these attacks continue to be targeted towards a specific admin, then not only can things get very messy, any prompt action to curb such disruption by said admin might be circumvented by the aggressor, and could ultimately destroy a previously harmonious wiki site.
As of June 2024, WikiIndex has seventeen (17) administrators, although only one or two of them are active on a daily or regular basis. The full list of WikiIndex administrators can be found here.
- See also