Welcome to WikiIndex — the 'wiki index' of all wikis, wiki people, wiki software, wiki farms, and wiki ideas.
Please add your wiki, and join our community.
Note: WikiIndex is not a wiki hosting service.

(please log-in to bypass the anti-spam CAPTCHA and remove this heading notice)

WikiIndex:Administrators: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Text replacement - "Wiki People" to "Wiki people"
(See this page for a list of WikiIndex sysop (Administrator) members.)
m (Text replacement - "Wiki People" to "Wiki people")
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
'''WikiIndex:Administrators''' is fundamentally the first {{tag|user group}} into which a regular [[wiki]] editor here on {{tag|WikiIndex}} is 'promoted' into (rather than being auto-included by way of default or number of [[edit]]s).
'''WikiIndex:Administrators''' is fundamentally the first {{tag|user group}} into which a regular [[wiki]] editor here on {{tag|WikiIndex}} is 'promoted' into (rather than being auto-included by way of default or number of [[edit]]s).


[[Administrator]]s, frequently shortened to 'admins', and commonly also known as [[sysop]]s, are usually trusted {{tag|Wiki People|wiki people}} who have been invited to take on more specific roles within the day-to-day operation of the [[WhatIsWiki|wiki]].  Some [[User|people]] may sometimes volunteer their services by requesting to become an administrator, whereas others prefer to wait to be invited.  Whichever method is adopted, the element of trust is a fundamentally important attribute of a good admin, because admins are able to exercise a significant degree of control over the regular [[editor]] folks.  One of the most powerful roles of a wiki administrator is to remove the editing rights of another person on the wiki, by way of [[block]]ing, which is clearly a drastic, though sometimes needed action.  In reality, on a well-run and harmonious [[wiki community]], with a core of constructive editors who work well within the scope or aims of a wiki, administrators will often find they have little or no 'administrative' actions to undertake on a daily basis.  In these instances, administrators will find they generally carry out 'housekeeping' duties, such as deleting [[spam]], moving (renaming) pages to a name which is already in existence (typically they already exist as a [[redirect]]), protecting pages which appear to be the target of repeated spamming or [[vandal]]ism, or sadly protecting pages which are the subject of an [[edit war]]!  Arguably, the best wiki administrators are those who still continue to the fundamental core aims of a wiki, in being a regular editor, contributor, and in general, just being 'A N Other' member of the wiki editing community.
[[Administrator]]s, frequently shortened to 'admins', and commonly also known as [[sysop]]s, are usually trusted {{tag|Wiki people|wiki people}} who have been invited to take on more specific roles within the day-to-day operation of the [[WhatIsWiki|wiki]].  Some [[User|people]] may sometimes volunteer their services by requesting to become an administrator, whereas others prefer to wait to be invited.  Whichever method is adopted, the element of trust is a fundamentally important attribute of a good admin, because admins are able to exercise a significant degree of control over the regular [[editor]] folks.  One of the most powerful roles of a wiki administrator is to remove the editing rights of another person on the wiki, by way of [[block]]ing, which is clearly a drastic, though sometimes needed action.  In reality, on a well-run and harmonious [[wiki community]], with a core of constructive editors who work well within the scope or aims of a wiki, administrators will often find they have little or no 'administrative' actions to undertake on a daily basis.  In these instances, administrators will find they generally carry out 'housekeeping' duties, such as deleting [[spam]], moving (renaming) pages to a name which is already in existence (typically they already exist as a [[redirect]]), protecting pages which appear to be the target of repeated spamming or [[vandal]]ism, or sadly protecting pages which are the subject of an [[edit war]]!  Arguably, the best wiki administrators are those who still continue to the fundamental core aims of a wiki, in being a regular editor, contributor, and in general, just being 'A N Other' member of the wiki editing community.


Due to the nature of the privileges which administrators enjoy, along with the fact they have been deemed to be trustworthy enough to have been awarded the role in the first place, administrators are often seen as, and used as figures of authority.  Indeed, administrators are usually called upon to assist in resolving any conflicts, disagreements, [[edit war]]s, and the likes between other people on the wiki.  Administrators will often be required to mediate, offer advice and direction, provide empathy, clarity and assistance in the compliance, or lack of, established community [[WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines|policies]] and [[:Category:Guidelines|guidelines]].  And it will usually be one or more administrators who are required to form the definitive answer in such issues, ideally whilst providing concessions to appease any seemingly aggrieved party.  When areas of policy or guidelines are found to be lacking, or maybe existent but defective, administrators are usually expected to help in the development and / or improvement in these areas.
Due to the nature of the privileges which administrators enjoy, along with the fact they have been deemed to be trustworthy enough to have been awarded the role in the first place, administrators are often seen as, and used as figures of authority.  Indeed, administrators are usually called upon to assist in resolving any conflicts, disagreements, [[edit war]]s, and the likes between other people on the wiki.  Administrators will often be required to mediate, offer advice and direction, provide empathy, clarity and assistance in the compliance, or lack of, established community [[WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines|policies]] and [[:Category:Guidelines|guidelines]].  And it will usually be one or more administrators who are required to form the definitive answer in such issues, ideally whilst providing concessions to appease any seemingly aggrieved party.  When areas of policy or guidelines are found to be lacking, or maybe existent but defective, administrators are usually expected to help in the development and / or improvement in these areas.
Line 21: Line 21:
*[[WikiIndex:Users]]
*[[WikiIndex:Users]]


[[Category:Wiki People|*]]
[[Category:Wiki people|*]]
[[Category:Admin| ]]
[[Category:Admin| ]]

Navigation menu