Category talk:Browse: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Added {{CategoryDiscussions}}) |
EarthFurst (talk | contribs) (Category:Should be empty?) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
{{CategoryDiscussions}} | {{CategoryDiscussions}} | ||
== Category:Should be empty? == | |||
Should there be a “Should be empty” category? For categories such as “[[:Category:New York]]” (see talk on that Category:New York page.) --[[User:EarthFurst|EarthFurst]] 18:51, 28 January 2008 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 23:51, 28 January 2008
As I see language categories expanding from English, French, German and onward. I wonder about scalabilty questions and wonder if a language toolbar be added somewhere, or something like that. Food for thought, Best, MarkDilley | talk
Ted, grooving along with your recent wiki discoveries, what do you think about {{Browse}}?
- Do you mean in place of [[Category:Browse]]? Would you envision that template having any text or just being a shortcut to putting a page in the category? We have few templates now, like add, delete and the like, that put a notice on the page as well as categorizing. We just need to figure out what works best. TedErnst | talk 13:29, 9 Mar 2006 (EST)
Category:Should be empty?
Should there be a “Should be empty” category? For categories such as “Category:New York” (see talk on that Category:New York page.) --EarthFurst 18:51, 28 January 2008 (EST)