Banning: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (Created page with "'''Banning''' is the exclusion of a user from the privilege of editing a wiki. It is usually a longer-term measure than a block.") |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "Category:WikiConcept" to "Category:Wiki concept") |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Banning''' is the exclusion of a user from the privilege of | '''Banning''' is the exclusion of a [[user]] from the privilege of [[edit]]ing a [[wiki]]. It is not a technical measure, rather an {{tag|admin}}istrative decision, resulting in technical longer-term measures like the [[block]]ing of a [[user account]]. | ||
On some [[:Category:Wikimedia Foundation|Wikimedia Foundation]] (WMF) projects, the [[meta-wiki:Standard offer|standard offer]] allows users to get un-banned after six months of not socking; on the [[English Wikipedia]], in which the [[Wikipedia Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] (ArbComm) has taken a more active role in imposing bans (often for off-[[WhatIsWiki|wiki]] activity), the standard offer is granted more rarely than when the community was in charge of making the decision. | |||
;''See also | |||
*[[WikiIndex:Blocking and banning policy]] | |||
[[Category:Wiki concept]] | |||
[[Category:Glossary]] |
Latest revision as of 13:51, 4 November 2022
Banning is the exclusion of a user from the privilege of editing a wiki. It is not a technical measure, rather an administrative decision, resulting in technical longer-term measures like the blocking of a user account.
On some Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) projects, the standard offer allows users to get un-banned after six months of not socking; on the English Wikipedia, in which the Arbitration Committee (ArbComm) has taken a more active role in imposing bans (often for off-wiki activity), the standard offer is granted more rarely than when the community was in charge of making the decision.
- See also