Semi-deletion (concept): Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Manorainjan moved page Semi-deletion to User:Leucosticte/Semi-deletion: Until You are clear in what namespace this ought to be, which category and the like. Better You start Your first attempts always in Your own namespace ;-))
m (Text replacement - "WikiIdea" to "wiki idea")
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Semi-deletion''' or '''pure wiki deletion''' was a proposal for a revamping of wikis' deletion processes that never went much of anywhere. It would have established a new tier of deletion, page semi-deletion, in addition to the already-existing page deletion and revision deletion. [[Brian Wolff]] remarked that it might suffice to give all users power to view revisions of deleted pages (i.e. those stored in the [[mw:Manual:archive table|archive table]]). The counter-argument to this was that pages deleted for being, say, [[copyvio]]s, would not be suitable to be viewed by all users.
'''Semi-deletion''', or '''pure wiki deletion''', was a {{tag|wiki idea|proposal}}, initially raised in late [[:Category:Founded in 2003|2003]], for a revamping of [[wiki]]s' deletion processes on [[:Category:Wikipedia|Wikipedia]] that never materialised. It would have established a new tier of [[deletion]]: page semi-deletion, in addition to the already-existing page deletion and [[revision deletion]]. Brian Wolff remarked that it might suffice to give all [[user]]s power to view revisions of deleted pages (i.e. those stored in the {{tag|wiki}} sites' {{Mw|Manual:archive table|archive table}}). A counter-argument to this was that pages deleted for being, say, [[copyvio]]s, would not be suitable to be viewed by all users.
 
;''Observation of proposal
The [[:Category:Copyright|copyright]] argument was completely bogus, the kind of thinking that got [[English Wikipedia]] trapped into endless controversy.  Actual copyvio could be absolutely deleted.  The proposal would not have kept illegal content!  If combined with routine [[WikiIndex:Protected page|protection]] of such pages, when deleted through a closed discussion, the continual problem of the re-creation of such pages would have been greatly reduced, it would then have required an admin action to allow the page to be unblanked.  On [[:Category:Wikiversity|Wikiversity]], an analogous processes was established by {{U|Abd}}.
 
;''Further reading
*[[Meatball:PlayingDead|PlayingDead]] — at [[Meatball Wiki]]
*{{WMF-Meta|History of wiki deletion process}} — at [[Wikimedia Meta-Wiki]]
*{{WMF-Meta|Strengths and weaknesses of the current deletion system}} — at Wikimedia Meta-Wiki
*{{WMF-Meta|Deletion management redesign}} — at Wikimedia Meta-Wiki
*{{Wp|Wikipedia:Deletion reform}} — at the [[English Wikipedia]]
 
;''External links
*{{Wp|Wikipedia:Pure wiki deletion system}} (WP:PWD) — at the English Wikipedia
*{{WMF-Meta|Semi-deletion}} — at Wikimedia Meta-Wiki
*{{Mw|Semi-deletion}} — at [[MediaWiki.org]]
 
[[Category:Wiki| ]]

Latest revision as of 16:35, 5 January 2023

Semi-deletion, or pure wiki deletion, was a proposal, initially raised in late 2003, for a revamping of wikis' deletion processes on Wikipedia that never materialised. It would have established a new tier of deletion: page semi-deletion, in addition to the already-existing page deletion and revision deletion. Brian Wolff remarked that it might suffice to give all users power to view revisions of deleted pages (i.e. those stored in the wiki sites' archive table). A counter-argument to this was that pages deleted for being, say, copyvios, would not be suitable to be viewed by all users.

Observation of proposal

The copyright argument was completely bogus, the kind of thinking that got English Wikipedia trapped into endless controversy. Actual copyvio could be absolutely deleted. The proposal would not have kept illegal content! If combined with routine protection of such pages, when deleted through a closed discussion, the continual problem of the re-creation of such pages would have been greatly reduced, it would then have required an admin action to allow the page to be unblanked. On Wikiversity, an analogous processes was established by Abd.

Further reading
External links