Category talk:Browse: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(response) |
(Added {{CategoryDiscussions}}) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
: Do you mean in place of '''<nowiki>[[Category:Browse]]</nowiki>'''? Would you envision that template having any text or just being a shortcut to putting a page in the category? We have few templates now, like '''add''', '''delete''' and the like, that put a notice on the page as well as categorizing. We just need to figure out what works best. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:29, 9 Mar 2006 (EST) | : Do you mean in place of '''<nowiki>[[Category:Browse]]</nowiki>'''? Would you envision that template having any text or just being a shortcut to putting a page in the category? We have few templates now, like '''add''', '''delete''' and the like, that put a notice on the page as well as categorizing. We just need to figure out what works best. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:29, 9 Mar 2006 (EST) | ||
{{CategoryDiscussions}} | |||
Revision as of 22:09, 16 October 2006
As I see language categories expanding from English, French, German and onward. I wonder about scalabilty questions and wonder if a language toolbar be added somewhere, or something like that. Food for thought, Best, MarkDilley | talk
Ted, grooving along with your recent wiki discoveries, what do you think about {{Browse}}?
- Do you mean in place of [[Category:Browse]]? Would you envision that template having any text or just being a shortcut to putting a page in the category? We have few templates now, like add, delete and the like, that put a notice on the page as well as categorizing. We just need to figure out what works best. TedErnst | talk 13:29, 9 Mar 2006 (EST)