Wikispooks: Difference between revisions
(details) |
(Categories) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Size | {{Size | ||
|pages= | |pages=3730 | ||
|statistics URL=https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Special:Statistics | |statistics URL=https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Special:Statistics | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Description== | ==Description== | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
The purpose of WikiSpooks is to build a repository of documents about deep political structures and events, together with development of the information they contain through user contributed articles, additions, edits and discussion. Emphasis is on the period from about 150 years ago to the present, although analysis of events in earlier times, by way of illustration and understanding of how deep politics operates, is encouraged - a classic example would be the Gunpowder Plot of 1605 in England. | The purpose of WikiSpooks is to build a repository of documents about deep political structures and events, together with development of the information they contain through user contributed articles, additions, edits and discussion. Emphasis is on the period from about 150 years ago to the present, although analysis of events in earlier times, by way of illustration and understanding of how deep politics operates, is encouraged - a classic example would be the Gunpowder Plot of 1605 in England. | ||
| Line 34: | Line 28: | ||
3. Reputation, Position, Rank, Place etc., in Establishment hierarchies and protocols (both current and historical) should be treated as pretentious conceits serving Establishment agendas (hidden or otherwise) and thus more deserving of ridicule and satire than respect. | 3. Reputation, Position, Rank, Place etc., in Establishment hierarchies and protocols (both current and historical) should be treated as pretentious conceits serving Establishment agendas (hidden or otherwise) and thus more deserving of ridicule and satire than respect. | ||
(As of: 15 July 2013) | (As of: 15 July 2013) | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Politics]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Deep Politics]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:False Flags]] | ||
[[Category:History]] | |||
[[Category:Hidden History]] | |||
[[Category:Leaks]] | |||
[[Category:FoundedIn2010]] | |||
Revision as of 11:24, 15 July 2013
| https://wikispooks.com/triangle.png | Wikispooks Recent changes [No WikiNode] About [No Mobile URL] |
|---|---|
| Founded by: | |
| Status: | Active |
| Language: | English |
| Edit mode: | ConfirmEmail |
| Wiki engine: | Semantic MediaWiki |
| Wiki license: | Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike"Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike" is not in the list (Custom license, Attribution to contributing authors, Copyright to contributing authors, Site retains copyright, WTFPL, Licence Art Libre, Open Content License, Apache License, BSD Documentation License, FreeBSD Documentation License, ...) of allowed values for the "Wiki license" property. |
| Main topic: | Deep political structures and events, hidden truths. |
| Wiki size: | 3,730 article pages see stats |
Description
The purpose of WikiSpooks is to build a repository of documents about deep political structures and events, together with development of the information they contain through user contributed articles, additions, edits and discussion. Emphasis is on the period from about 150 years ago to the present, although analysis of events in earlier times, by way of illustration and understanding of how deep politics operates, is encouraged - a classic example would be the Gunpowder Plot of 1605 in England.
The WikiSpooks editorial policy can be summarised as follows:
1. The veracity and accuracy of official announcements, documents, press releases etc should be treated as inversely proportional to the Power, Wealth, Statutory (or other claimed) Authority, in 'current Establishment hierarchies of their source. 2. Any such information should be assumed to be in furtherance of a hidden - if more or less obvious - agenda and thus designed to mislead rather than to inform. 3. Reputation, Position, Rank, Place etc., in Establishment hierarchies and protocols (both current and historical) should be treated as pretentious conceits serving Establishment agendas (hidden or otherwise) and thus more deserving of ridicule and satire than respect.
(As of: 15 July 2013)