Bureaucrats, checkuser, Interface administrators, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Suppressors, Administrators
83,693
edits
(Domain change.) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (move language links to top, convert all external links into either inline citations and/or interwiki links, brief update, tidy grammar, additional wikilinks and cats, Template:Fact x2, no doubt other stuff I've missed! :p) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''RationalWiki''' is an open [[wiki]] taking a [[:Category:Criticism|critical]] look at [[:Category:Pseudoscience| | ---- | ||
<center> | |||
;<big><big>[[RationalWiki]] wikis in these [[:Category:Wiki Language|languages]]</big> <sup>([[Template:RationalWiki|view]] / [[edit:Template:RationalWiki|edit]])</sup></big> | |||
[[RationalWiki (en)|English (en)]] • [[RationalWiki (ru)|Russian / ру́сский (ru)]]</center> | |||
---- | |||
'''RationalWiki''' is an open [[wiki]] taking a [[:Category:Criticism|critical]] look at [[:Category:Pseudoscience|pseudo-science]], and '[[:Category:Conservative|Conservative]]' and [[:Category:Christianity|Christian]] fundamentalist [[:Category:Politics|politics]], through the use of side-by-side examinations and [[:Category:Humor|humor]]. | |||
Stated goals are:<ref name=RW-WhatIs>[[RationalWiki:RationalWiki:What is a RationalWiki article?|RationalWiki: What is a RationalWiki article]]; ''RationalWiki.org''; accessed: 2018-08-01</ref> | |||
*Analyzing and refuting the [[:Category:Pseudoscience|pseudo-science]] and anti-[[:Category:Science|science]] movement, ideas and [[:Category:People|people]]; | |||
*Documenting the full range of crank [[:Category:Ideas|ideas]]; | |||
*Explorations of [[:Category:Authority|authoritarianism]] and fundamentalism; | |||
*Analysis and criticism of how these subjects are handled in the [[:Category:Media|media]]. | |||
As of January 2014, the original [[:Category:Wiki English|English]] language [[RationalWiki (en)|RationalWiki]] had about 395 active [[user]]s. 530 users had [[sysop]] rights; any sysop may add or remove sysop rights. The [[block log]] is used as a chat line.<ref name=RW-BlockLog>[[RationalWiki:Special:Log/block]]; ''RationalWiki.org''; accessed: 2018-08-01</ref> | |||
RationalWiki | RationalWiki runs a large collection of specially customized extensions, most of which were created by [[RationalWiki:User:Nx|User:Nx]], implementing a wide range of features, such as: up-down voting (WIGO, or what-is-going-on), slider voting, a site wide intercom system, a signature checker, and easy [[:Category:Bible|Bible]] quotations.<ref name=RW-Version>[[RationalWiki:Special:Version]]; ''RationalWiki.org''; accessed: 2018-08-01</ref> The source code of many of these extensions has been made publicly available. | ||
RationalWiki also has a namespace dedicated to [[Conservapedia]],<ref>[https://RationalWiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AllPages&namespace=100 All pages (Conservapedia namespace)]; ''RationalWiki.org''; accessed: 2018-08-01</ref> and a collection of recipes,<ref>[https://RationalWiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AllPages&namespace=108 All pages (Recipe namespace)]; ''RationalWiki.org''; accessed: 2018-08-01</ref> some of which are pseudo-recipes whose real purpose is to impart jokes<ref>[[RationalWiki:Recipe:Insanity]]; ''RationalWiki.org''; accessed: 2018-08-01</ref> or religious commentary.<ref>[[RationalWiki:Recipe:Atheist's Nightmare]]; ''RationalWiki.org''; accessed: 2018-08-01</ref> The site's slogan rotates among several dozen possibilities, some of which are weighted more heavily than others.<ref>[https://RationalWiki.org/w/index.php?title=Template:RationalWiki_Slogan&action=edit View source for Template:RationalWiki Slogan]; ''RationalWiki.org''; accessed: 2018-08-01</ref> | |||
{{TOCright}} | |||
==History== | ==History== | ||
RationalWiki started in [[:Category:FoundedIn2007|May 2007]] after a group of | RationalWiki started in [[:Category:FoundedIn2007|May 2007]], after a group of [[editor]]s at [[Conservapedia]] were banned over [[:Category:Ideology|ideological]] differences with the authorities there. Their edits had consisted mostly of debating on [[talk page]]s, attempting to counteract what they perceived to be overwhelming anti-scientific and [[:Category:Wikis with a strong viewpoint|far-right]] political biases. Although the site was called RationalWiki to highlight the apparent pro-scientific [[:Category:Earth|worldview]] of the [[founder]]s, the content was largely weighted to the perceived lunacy of events at Conservapedia. As of January 2014, voting was ongoing concerning whether to expand RationalWiki's mission. It appeared unlikely that RationalWiki was going to explicitly embrace the idea of becoming a general encyclopaedia.<ref>[[RationalWiki:Forum:Expanding RW's mission#Less talking, more voting!]]; ''RationalWiki.org''; accessed: 2018-08-01</ref> | ||
==RationalWiki today== | ==RationalWiki today== | ||
While [[Conservapedia]] continues to be a major source of traffic to RationalWiki (mainly, their [[RationalWiki:Conservapedia:What is going on at CP | While [[Conservapedia]] continues to be a major source of traffic to RationalWiki (mainly, their [[RationalWiki:Conservapedia:What is going on at CP?|What is going on at Conservapedia?]] page), RationalWiki have branched out into many areas of skepticism. Many articles focus on unfounded [[:Category:Medical|medical]] claims, pseudo-science, and Biblical literalism. Despite a seemingly [[:Category:Atheism|pro-atheist]], [[:Category:Religion|anti-religious]] stance, some [[editor]]s are practicing Christians, [[:Category:Judaism|Jews]], [[:Category:Islam|Muslims]], or [[wp:Heathenry (new religious movement)|Odinists]] (among others); tending towards the more liberal aspects of their religion rather than fundamentalism. However, most of the regular contributers to RationalWiki are atheists. | ||
The site works to refute a range of faith-based ideas as well as superstitions. They have critical material on [[:Category:Scientology|Scientology]], [[:Category:Christianity|Christianity]], [[:Category:Creationism|Creationism]], [[:Category:Astrology|Astrology]], | The site works to refute a range of [[:Category:Faith|faith]]-based ideas, as well as superstitions. They have critical material on [[:Category:Scientology|Scientology]], [[:Category:Christianity|Christianity]], [[:Category:Creationism|Creationism]], [[:Category:Astrology|Astrology]], 'New Age' philosophy, and many others. It also comments critically on other Christian creationist wikis, like the relatively unnotable, if it weren't for their editors joining up to argue with the founder, [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]] (see [[RationalWiki:A Storehouse of Knowledge|RationalWiki: A Storehouse of Knowledge]]). | ||
The website has an idiosyncratic sense of humour, which includes widespread intentional misspellings and other peculiar phrases. There are many | The website has an idiosyncratic sense of [[:Category:Humor|humour]], which includes widespread intentional misspellings and other peculiar phrases. There are many 'inside jokes', particularly in the material relating to [[Conservapedia]], and the writing often has the tone of a close-knit social group. Some dialog takes place through log summaries for very short blocks.<ref name=RW-BlockLog/> | ||
RationalWiki has one or two [[:Category:GreatFeature|great features]] — readers can vote on their | RationalWiki has one or two [[:Category:GreatFeature|great features]] — readers can vote on their 'What Is Going On' pages;{{Fact}} there are random text generators for entertainment purposes — usually for parodying various figures at Conservapedia.{{Fact}} | ||
A former example of RationalWiki's perspective (subsequently revised):- | |||
<blockquote>''As a site we have a point of view, and that point of view is that the scientific method and the information gained from its application is better than almost anything else humanity has come up with. We believe that the support of, profiting from and creation of pseudosciences is dangerous and wrong. | <blockquote>''As a site we have a [[:Category:Point of view|point of view]], and that point of view is that the scientific method and the information gained from its application is better than almost anything else humanity has come up with. We believe that the support of, profiting from and creation of pseudosciences is dangerous and wrong.''<ref name=RW-WhatIs/><!--not found in given citation--></blockquote> | ||
==Policies and guidelines== | ==Policies and guidelines== | ||
RationalWiki has a set of community standards to which it sometimes/somewhat adheres. For example, it states "Talk pages should ''never'' be deleted" but in actual practice, talk | :''Expand section, with citations'' | ||
RationalWiki has a set of [[Wiki community|community]] standards to which it sometimes / somewhat adheres. For example, it states "Talk pages should ''never'' be deleted", but in actual practice, [[talk page]]s deemed to consist of [[troll]]ing sometimes are deleted. [[:Category:Policy|Policies]] are few, and readily disregarded. | |||
==Culture== | ==Culture== | ||
:''Expand section, with citations'' | |||
[[RationalWikian]]s generally tend to frown on editing articles from a non-leftist point of view, and favor instead having talk page discussions with dissenting viewpoints. | |||
==Critiques== | ==Critiques== | ||
Former [[Conservapedia]] sysop and [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]] founder Philip J. Rayment harshly criticized RationalWiki as | Former [[Conservapedia]] sysop and [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]] founder [[Philip J. Rayment]] harshly criticized RationalWiki as; "[A] place of filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes".<ref>[[ask:User talk:Philip J. Rayment/Archive 2#Invitation|User talk:Philip J. Rayment/Archive 2#Invitation]]; ''aStorehouseofKnowledge.info''; [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]]; accessed: 2018-08-01</ref> RationalWiki is often criticized as intolerant toward minority opinions. [[Encyclopedia Dramatica]] argues; "RationalWiki doesn't seem to realize that science is dynamic, and established theories may be rejected in the future."<ref>[[ed:RationalWiki#How to Trolling RationalWiki|RationalWiki - How to Trolling RationalWiki]]; ''EncyclopediaDramatica.rs''; [[Encyclopedia Dramatica]]; accessed: 2018-08-01</ref> | ||
==RationalWiki Foundation== | ==RationalWiki Foundation== | ||
In July 2010, | In July 2010, [[owner]]ship of the RationalWiki websites transferred to a [[:Category:Nonprofit|non-profit]] foundation called the '''RationalWiki Foundation'''.<ref name=RW-RWF-RMF>[[RationalWiki:RationalWiki:RationalMedia Foundation|RationalWiki:RationalMedia Foundation]]; ''RationalWiki.org''; accessed: 2018-08-01</ref> This did not entail a substantive change in the day-to-day running of the site. In July 2013, the name of the Foundation was formally changed, following a unanimous vote of the Foundation Board for such change.<ref name=RW-RWF-RMF/> | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*[[RationalWikiWiki]] meta site for RationalWiki (defunct) | *[[RationalWikiWiki]] — a former [[:Category:Meta|meta]] site for RationalWiki (now [[:Category:Dead|defunct]]) | ||
*[[Liberapedia]] started as a parody of [[Conservapedia]]; it is a less formal wiki that is inclusive of both humor and serious content | *[[Liberapedia]] started as a parody of [[Conservapedia]]; it is a less formal wiki that is inclusive of both humor and serious content | ||
*[[RationalWikiWikiWiki]] criticism and discussion site of RationalWiki and RationalWikiWiki (defunct) | *[[RationalWikiWikiWiki]] — a criticism and discussion site of RationalWiki and RationalWikiWiki (now defunct) | ||
==References== | |||
<References/> | |||
==Similar wikis== | ==Similar wikis== | ||
*[[Debatepedia wiki]] also discusses controversial topics – but puts both viewpoints side-by-side on the same page – RationalWiki also has side-by-side articles | *[[Debatepedia wiki]] also discusses controversial topics – but puts both viewpoints side-by-side on the same page – RationalWiki also has side-by-side articles | ||
*[[Psiram]] | *[[Psiram]] — a wiki similar in attitude (multilingual)<includeonly> | ||
[[Category:Wikis with a strong viewpoint]] | |||
[[Category:Ideology]] | |||
[[Category:Criticism]] | [[Category:Criticism]] | ||
[[Category:Pseudoscience]] | |||
[[Category:People]] | |||
[[Category:Ideas]] | |||
[[Category:Media]] | |||
[[Category:Humor]] | [[Category:Humor]] | ||
[[Category:Medical]] | |||
[[Category:Politics]] | [[Category:Politics]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Conservative]] | ||
[[Category:Religion]] | |||
[[Category:Bible]] | |||
[[Category:Christianity]] | |||
[[Category:Creationism]] | |||
[[Category:Scientology]] | |||
[[Category:Atheism]] | [[Category:Atheism]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Astrology]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:GreatFeature]]</includeonly> | ||
<noinclude> | <noinclude> | ||
[[Category:Article templates]]</noinclude> | [[Category:Article templates]]</noinclude> | ||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | __NOEDITSECTION__ | ||
edits