1,853
edits
Eros of Fire (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1,200: | Line 1,200: | ||
The neutrality of this beautiful wiki-index is being risked[[User:Eros of Fire|Eros of Fire]] 08:10, 19 November 2008 (EST) | The neutrality of this beautiful wiki-index is being risked[[User:Eros of Fire|Eros of Fire]] 08:10, 19 November 2008 (EST) | ||
== Conservapedia, RationalWiki etc == | |||
There’s an edit war in progress over [[Conservapedia]], [[RationalWiki]], and [[The Conservapedia RationalWiki war]]. More can be found on the talk pages of all 3 articles and in the page histories. I’m biased in favour of RationalWiki. Conservapedia supporters would an impartial administrator to intervene. I will try to summarize objectively. | |||
#’’’RationalWiki point of view:’’’ Conservapedia deserves the criticism. Conservapedia regularly blocks and deletes dissent on its website. They want to prevent criticism similarly here. There are especially large articles criticizing Conservapedia on Wikiindex because there are special problems with Conservapedia. | |||
#’’’ Conservapedia point of view:’’’ RationalWiki are wiki vandals and irresponsible atheists. We struggle to keep our wiki Christian and fundamentalist and RationalWiki vandals cause us constant problems. (As a RationalWikian I feel this criticism is true of a few RationalWikians but not all). No other wiki has such long prominent criticism and Conservapedia shouldn’t either. If criticism is allowed here critical sections can spread to other wikis and explode out of control. Some users who appear neutral also feel that criticism shouldn’t be allowed because of this. | |||
I’ve considered things. It can be a shock when a user doesn’t know that he/she is committing a blockable offense and suddenly is looking at a ban window. This can happen on many wikis. Problems with users being blocked for expressing dissenting views aren’t unique to Conservapedia. To address this I’ve made a new category, [http://www.wikiindex.org/Category:Wikis_with_a_strong_viewpoint Wikis with a strong viewpoint]. To be neutral I’ve included many secular wikis as well as religious wikis in this category. | |||
edits