Please add your wiki, and join our community. Note: WikiIndex is not a wiki hosting service.
(please log-in to bypass the anti-spam Captcha and remove this heading notice)
User talk:This is not the solution: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (Thanks to everyone for the cooling off - here is my idea on how to move through this.) |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
I appreciate that. I will try to sort through stuff and check back in later. ~~ [[MarkDilley]] | I appreciate that. I will try to sort through stuff and check back in later. ~~ [[MarkDilley]] | ||
== Thanks to everyone for the cooling off - here is my idea on how to move through this. == | |||
I appreciate everyone talking a step back. One of the things I love about [[Wiki]] is that anyone can edit anything, and when there is a [[diff]] - we try to work through it. I am aware, peripherally, that there are disputes between people and perhaps communities. These include [[RationalWiki]], [[Liberalpedia]] and [[Conservapedia]]. What I am interested in having done on [[WikiIndex]] - is to move everything to the talk page for those three [[wiki]] - and act as the moderator. This is only a suggestion to get us through. Please let me know if you think this is an acceptable solution for you. Best, [[MarkDilley]] |
Revision as of 05:31, 26 August 2009
I am late to this. Can you explain what is going on? - please use this talk page to do it. ~~ MarkDilley
- I will. User:Nx was blocked for removing spammy links to Liberapedia and various inaccuracies and repititions on the RationalWiki article; Proxima also protected the article to keep her version up. Nx emailed the people in charge and tried to get Proxima stripped of her rights, but when there was no response, someone started mass vandalism to try and attract some attention. 92.233.174.117 06:22, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
I gave a link to Liberapedia as that wiki also has material critical of Conservapedia and I know many readers of the RationalWiki article will like that type of information. They called that spam, well I've now added another link Digging the Dirt on the Lunacy that is Conservapedia with better material about problems with Conservapedia. I only found out about that second website this morning and when I was under pressure I didn't think to add it. I hope the links are less spammy and more acceptable. Proxima Centauri 07:07, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
- It's a bit too late for that now. Anyway, would you please come to irc to discuss this: http://webchat.freenode.net/ , type wikiindex into channel Please unblock Nx and his IP, thank you 07:14, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
I added the link about two hours after I found out about it and about half an hour after the pressure was off me so that is not late. Proxima Centauri 07:23, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
- You added the link to Psy's blog today. After the whole mess. In an attempt to make your link to Liberapedia look less like blatant advertising. And keep in mind that we didn't remove every link to Liberapedia, it was there with the other places RWians went to (although noone went to LP, guess why?), we just removed the advertisement
- Also, unblock me please, and join us at IRC. Please unblock Nx and his IP, thank you 07:26, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
- Several users or several sockpuppets of the same user first insisted on getting the RationalWiki article their way if they could, then when I protected that article they started general vandalism. I hope I've cleared it all up. As far as I know they're all blocked but the user or users are experts at ban evasion and range blocks may be needed if it restarts. Proxima Centauri 06:19, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
- First, I apologize for the vandalism. I will clean up everything on my own. The issue is that Proxima Centauri is abusing her powers and reverting and protecting any edits to RationalWiki, Liberapedia and other articles. She claims that removing content is a blockable offense. If you look at her edits at RationalWiki, you'll see that's an absurd claim, for example, look at this, which contains two wrong dates, unnecessary quoting of the linked blog post and comment (I've summarised the content instead, and linked to the post), and her speculation about when the site would come back and a sentence before that does state when the site will come back. Only getting the right date there was a struggle. But her main problem seems to be that I and others have removed a paragraph advertising Liberapedia. Then there's Liberapedia, which is her own wiki. I tried to improve her writing, but she reverted me without explanation and locked the article for a month. [1]. Category talk:Active administrators of this wiki also contains a previous incident during which she abused her powers on RationalWiki to pursue a personal grudge. 65.60.37.195 06:26, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
- I'll help with the vandalism, by the way. Phantom Hoover2 06:27, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
Assume Good Faith
So - I am starting from this point. I know we are in a mess and I am late - but that is were I would like to start.
User:Proxima Centauri has done a lot of work here and for that I am grateful.
- Yet she doesn't assume good faith. She has now blocked Phantom Hoover2 who has helped revert the vandalism.
- BtW, don't unblock Phantom Hoover2, unblock Phantom Hoover; I'm fed up with using my neighbour's WiFi. 70.84.211.82 06:36, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
She may have done a lot of work, but that doesn't excuse her behavior. She failed to assume good faith when Phantom Hoover removed the offending paragraph in RationalWiki, then she blocked me without warning with the justification that since I've edited Phantom Hoover's talk page, I should know that removing content is a blockable offense. She did not justify any of her reversions. It seems she didn't even read the edits she reverted, because she then asked a question that she would know the answer to had she read the edit. Please unblock Nx and his IP, thank you 06:39, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
I want a cooling off period
Phantom Hoover - will you accept that? ~~ MarkDilley
- Yeah, but can you unblock User:Nx (who is the one who really didn't deserve his block), his IP, and block ID #586, which is my home IP. Phantom Hoover2 06:45, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
- Nx's IP has block ID #576. He's the one who you should be addressing all of this to; I just got tangled up in it. Phantom Hoover2 06:47, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
I appreciate that. I will try to sort through stuff and check back in later. ~~ MarkDilley
Thanks to everyone for the cooling off - here is my idea on how to move through this.
I appreciate everyone talking a step back. One of the things I love about Wiki is that anyone can edit anything, and when there is a diff - we try to work through it. I am aware, peripherally, that there are disputes between people and perhaps communities. These include RationalWiki, Liberalpedia and Conservapedia. What I am interested in having done on WikiIndex - is to move everything to the talk page for those three wiki - and act as the moderator. This is only a suggestion to get us through. Please let me know if you think this is an acceptable solution for you. Best, MarkDilley