Template:RationalWiki

RationalWiki is an open wiki taking a critical look at pseudoscience and "Conservative" and Christian fundamentalist politics, through the use of side-by-side examinations and humor.

Stated goals are:

• Analyzing and refuting the anti-science movement, ideas and people.
• Analyzing and refuting the full range of crank ideas.
• Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism.
• Analysis and criticism of how these subjects are handled in the media.

As of January 2014, the original English language RationalWiki had about 395 active users. 530 users had sysop rights; any sysop may add or remove sysop rights. The block log is used as a chat line.

RationalWiki runs a large collection of specially customized extensions, most of which were created by Nx, implementing a wide range of features such as up-down voting (WIGO, or what-is-going-on), slider voting, a site wide intercom system, a signature checker, and easy Bible quotations.[1] The source code of most of these extensions has been made publicly available.

RationalWiki also has a namespace dedicated to Conservapedia[2] and a collection of recipes,[3] some of which are pseudo-recipes whose real purpose is to impart jokes[4] or religious commentary.[5] The site's slogan rotates among several dozen possibilities, some of which are weighted more heavily than others.[6]

History

RationalWiki started in May 2007 after a group of editors at Conservapedia were banned over ideological differences with the authorities there. Their edits had consisted mostly of debating on talk pages, attempting to counteract what they perceived to be overwhelming anti-scientific and far-right political biases. Although the site was called RationalWiki to highlight the apparent pro-scientific worldview of the founders, the content was largely weighted to the perceived lunacy of events at Conservapedia. As of January 2014, voting was ongoing concerning whether to expand RationalWiki's mission. It appeared unlikely that RationalWiki was going to explicitly embrace the idea of becoming a general encyclopedia.[7]

RationalWiki today

While Conservapedia continues to be a major source of traffic to RationalWiki (mainly, their What is going on at Conservapedia? page), they have branched out into many areas of skepticism. Many articles focus on unfounded medical claims, pseudoscience, and Biblical literalism. Despite a seemingly pro-atheist, anti-religious stance, some editors are practicing Christians, Jews, Muslims, or Odinists (among others) tending towards the more liberal aspects of their religion rather than fundamentalism. However, most of the regular contributers to RationalWiki are atheists.

The site works to refute a range of faith-based ideas as well as superstitions. They have critical material on Scientology, Christianity, Creationism, Astrology, "New Age" philosophy, and many others. It also comments critically on other Christian creationist wikis, like the relatively unnotable, if it weren't for their editors joining up to argue with the founder, A Storehouse of Knowledge (see RationalWiki: A Storehouse of Knowledge).

The website has an idiosyncratic sense of humour, which includes widespread intentional misspellings and other peculiar phrases. There are many "inside jokes", particularly in the material relating to Conservapedia, and the writing often has the tone of a close-knit social group. Some dialog takes place through log summaries for very short blocks [8]

RationalWiki has one or two great features — readers can vote on their "what Is Going On" pages; there are random text generators for entertainment purposes — usually for parodying various figures at Conservapedia.

Example of RationalWiki's perspective:-

As a site we have a point of view, and that point of view is that the scientific method and the information gained from its application is better than almost anything else humanity has come up with. We believe that the support of, profiting from and creation of pseudosciences is dangerous and wrong. RationalWiki:What is a RationalWiki article

Policies and guidelines

RationalWiki has a set of community standards to which it sometimes/somewhat adheres. For example, it states "Talk pages should never be deleted" but in actual practice, talk pages deemed to consist of trolling sometimes are deleted. Policies are few and readily disregarded.

It has become an established policy at Rational Wiki, through much debate, that millions of Soviet women deserved to be raped by Germans, and that those Germans responsible for institutionalized mass rape during the Holocaust are the real victims of World War II.

Actual quotes:

"RAPE RAPE NAZI RAPE" -Hipocrite

"Hi, Andy Schlafly's an Asshole who needs to get raped so he can see how great gay sex really is." -Jimmy Wales

"And rape!" -Hipocrite

"BOLDING EVERY TIME HE SAYS RAPE BECAUSE IT'S NOT OBSESSIVE AT ALL!" *bolded every use of the word rape on the page* -Hipocrite

"Notice: This article has too much rape. Please edit it such that it includes a reasonable amount of rape." -Hipocrite

"NAZI RAPE NAZI RAPE RAPE NAZI!" -Hipocrite

"...NAZI RAPE. It's basically a joke at this point" -Hipocrite

"Also, nazirape nazirape nazirape woo woo woo." -Nutty Roux (moderator, tech, board of trustees member)

"It's been my experience that, in addition to Nazis, ableists, racists, and ageists." -Nutty Roux (moderator, tech, board of trustees member)

"Woo! Nazirape!" -PowderSmokeAndLeather (moderator)

Culture

RationalWikians generally tend to frown on editing articles from a non-leftist point of view, and favor instead having talk page discussions with dissenting viewpoints. Arcane described them as "a self stroking circlejerk of groupthinking editors who care more about giving each other handjobs on their own personal projects than actually advancing the goal of their wiki." Arcane left Rational Wiki because of insane tirades by its members claiming that millions of Soviet women deserved to be raped by Germans.

Critiques

Former Conservapedia sysop and A Storehouse of Knowledge founder Philip J. Rayment harshly criticized RationalWiki as, "[A] place of filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes".[9] RationalWiki is often criticized as intolerant toward minority opinions. Encyclopedia Dramatica argues, "RationalWiki doesn't seem to realize that science is dynamic, and established theories may be rejected in the future."[10]

However, most of these people are just loonies who get mocked by Rational Wiki for spreading various magical or bigoted nonsense.

RationalWiki Foundation

In July 2010, ownership of the website transferred to a non-profit foundation called the RationalWiki Foundation.

See also

• RationalWikiWiki meta site for RationalWiki (defunct)
• Liberapedia started as a parody of Conservapedia; it is a less formal wiki that is inclusive of both humor and serious content
• RationalWikiWikiWiki criticism and discussion site of RationalWiki and RationalWikiWiki (defunct)
• Rational Wiki users go on a tirade about how millions of Soviet women deserved to be raped by Germans, and the Germans responsible for those rapes should be considered the true victims of World War II.

Similar wikis

• Debatepedia wiki also discusses controversial topics – but puts both viewpoints side-by-side on the same page – RationalWiki also has side-by-side articles
• Psiram – a wiki similar in attitude (multilingual)

RationalWiki wikis in these languages ^(edit)

English (en) • Russian / ру́сский (ru)