Wikispooks: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (removed Category:Deep Politics using HotCat)
m (Hoof Hearted moved page WikiSpooks to Wikispooks over redirect: Actually not CamelCase)
(No difference)

Revision as of 16:25, 9 September 2022

https://wikispooks.com/w/images/logo11.png
Wikispooks -
an encyclopaedia of deep politics

Recent changes • [No WikiNode] • About • [No Mobile URL]
Founded by:
Status: Active
Language: English
Edit mode: ConfirmEmail
Wiki engine: MediaWiki
Wiki license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike"Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike" is not in the list (Custom license, Attribution to contributing authors, Copyright to contributing authors, Site retains copyright, WTFPL, Licence Art Libre, Open Content License, Apache License, BSD Documentation License, FreeBSD Documentation License, ...) of allowed values for the "Wiki license" property.
Main topic: Politics
Wiki size: 29,857 article pages see stats

(As of: 12 July 2022)

The purpose of WikiSpooks is to build a repository of documents about deep political structures and events, together with development of the information they contain through user contributed articles, additions, edits and discussion. Emphasis is on the period from about 150 years ago to the present, although analysis of events in earlier times, by way of illustration and understanding of how deep politics operates, is encouraged - a classic example would be the Gunpowder Plot of 1605 in England.

The WikiSpooks editorial policy can be summarised as follows:

  1. The veracity and accuracy of official announcements, documents, press releases etc should be treated as inversely proportional to the Power, Wealth, Statutory (or other claimed) Authority, in 'current Establishment hierarchies of their source.
  2. Such information should be assumed to be in furtherance of a hidden - if more or less obvious - agenda and thus designed to mislead rather than to inform.
  3. Reputation, Position, Rank, Place etc., in Establishment hierarchies and protocols (both current and historical) should be treated as pretentious conceits serving Establishment agendas (hidden or otherwise) and thus more deserving of ridicule and satire than respect.