User talk:TedErnst: Difference between revisions
(Category Discussion) |
(WikiSize Categories) |
||
Line 158: | Line 158: | ||
- [[User:JenniferForUnity|JenniferForUnity]] 17:46, 16 October 2006 (EDT) | - [[User:JenniferForUnity|JenniferForUnity]] 17:46, 16 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
== WikiSize Categories == | |||
Hi Ted, | |||
what do you think about refinement in sizes like 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500 etc. ? It seems better to me to say that a wiki has more than 50 articles if it has 95 and rank it higher as wikis with about 11 articles. --[[User:Peu|Peu]] 16:38, 17 October 2006 (EDT) |
Revision as of 20:38, 17 October 2006
welcome ted! :-)
Hola
te invito a participar en mi wiki: www.wicodatos.org
--Wicodatos Colombia 11:31, 29 June 2006 (EDT)
FAQ
I don't know why your "FAQ" page redirects to mediawiki but I suspect some kind of built-in functionality. Let's use WikiIndex:FrequentlyAskedQuestions for the time being.
images
http://static.flickr.com/19/95199503_e4c24693f6.jpg
Rather than uploading various sizes of the same image, just upload the largest size that will be needed. Fpr this example, assume the first image above is uploaded here as "TedErnst.jpg". The same results as what you've got would be obatined by typing the following:
[[Image:TedErnst.jpg]] [[Image:TedErnst.jpg|348px]] [[Image:TedErnst.jpg|193px]] [[Image:TedErnst.jpg|39px]]
Just specify the number of pixels wied you want an image to be scaled to. specify "thumb" to thumbnail it. other parameters include left, right, center, and frame. Any other text is put in as a caption. I'm going to upload a picture of myself and do all this on my page to show you what I mean. —User:Sean Fennel@ 12:31, 3 Mar 2006 (EST) EDIT: Apparently only thumbnailed images can have captions, but I think you can specify the size of thethumbnail.
recursiveness
it is not just on the Wiki Engine page, it is now on the Category_talk:All page
The recurisive problem is gone, did you do something with it, or did the database just flush it out? Soooo!! It looks great!!!! There is an issue with Lizzy still, I think in the Category:Enlish
As far as your comment: "UseModWiki isn't going to show up in the OpenEdit cat anymore, correct? Doesn't seem right." - not sure what you mean, I thought we solved that issue with a soft redirect? MarkDilley | talk
Reply from Andy
Hi Ted, I replied to your comment on DARwiki barnraising] Thanks. --Andy 10:04, 4 Mar 2006 (EST)
There's now a bit more information on the invitation which is going out to appropriate communities.
http://distributedresearch.net/wiki/index.php/Barn_raising#Invitation
I Hope this helps to answer your concerns to some extent. 3 days to go --Andy 05:10, 7 Mar 2006 (EST)
CamelCase and ordinary spaced-out sentence case
As suggested, I've just contributed. robinp 00:36, 7 Mar 2006 (EST)
Calming words :-) md
Hi Ted , once again sorry for all the updates , i will try to get out of the habit .. i do tend to operate through trial and error .. and my keyboard horrible to use
i'm sorry if you / users have decided that i am a complete paranoic .. not at all the case .. i had forgetten something ! i spoke to a google guy this morning and , suddenly reminded of my 'zen and the art of trouble shooting ' , started again .. it seems there IS malware operating in the proxy to my home IP server .. doh !
'spaced out' is rather apt for the moon of course , but hopefuly you'll understand that it's more 'cyber spaced out' .. the malware has been quite confusing , i have found myself half talking to the hacker on completely unrelated message boards , such as this one , trying to get rid of them or find out who they are so i can get on with an actual launch ! it doesn't seem very sensible to run a shop from a machine that's been usurped either ..
i hope this explains an odd perception of me
kind regards
the moøn 11:24, 14 Mar 2006 (EST)
Google News Alert!
I've got the EvoWiki as a Google News Alert. It's usually about one alert a month, except for one alert that had about a dozen blog entries in it. My latest Google alert for EvoWiki (just received) was for the WikiIndex article.
BTW: Could you take a look at User:BlankVerse/Sandbox and tell me what you think. User talk:BlankVerse 10:41, 17 Mar 2006 (EST)
Wikimedia Foundation
I am very confused. I recently created Wikimedia Foundation. And then, so there would be a category for all of the Wikimedia wikis, I created Category:Wikimedia. That category looked a little too much like Category:MediaWiki, so I then tried to create Category:Wikimedia Foundation. Although it looked like I had created the category, it would then magically disappear. What I am guessing is happening is that the software has been set up so that you can't have an article and a category with the same name. User:BlankVerse | talk 16:51, 25 Mar 2006 (EST)
- Thank you. I have no idea why the category wasn't created, but I tried several times.
- Another issue for the Wikimedia Foundation article is that I couldn't figure out a good category to put it into under Category:Browse. User:BlankVerse | talk 23:44, 26 Mar 2006 (EST)
auto-patroll
In an earlier discussion you had asked whether it was possible to "auto-patroll" certain users, and I replied that it isn't. That has changed. Admins now have this option in their preferneces under Editing in MediaWiki 1.6. So if you really want it, we can have it. —User:Sean Fennel@ 14:09, 11 Apr 2006 (EDT)
Wikipedia entries
Hey Ted, great work on the Wikipedia language entries! MarkDilley
monobook.js
I tried modifying mine and came to the conclusion that that feature (whatever its name is) must be turned off in the database. I'll just have to do without my rounded tabs. —User:Sean Fennel@ 11:17, 5 May 2006 (EDT)
Deletion
Hey Ted, I think we can wait for deletion of pages like that. See if they develope, maybe use the deletion tag? Best, MarkDilley
MediaWiki:Name
I didn't understand those changes you made (although I'm sure there a brilliant explanation) --Raymond King | talk 17:00, 13 May 2006 (EDT)
- Ah, i c, good idea, thx. --Raymond King | talk 20:24, 13 May 2006 (EDT)
Wikipedia
Hi Ted, I was just cleaning up the wikipedias, or so I thought. Take a look at what I was doing, tagging wikipedia, and removing the whole mess of links to other wikipedias. Again, I thought I was cleaning it up, but then thought you might have a specific plan for them. MarkDilley
WikiSym 2006 in Odense
Hi Ted, and thank you for leaving me a notice. I only heard about WikiSym a few weeks ago and was dead excited to hear it taking place here in Odense - of all places! :-) I hope very much to meet you there. We are trying to get a press accreditation, and a permit to cover the event on video. I will of course post the news on our site - for the moment I have been preoccupied with the news of Mr. Lessig visiting Denmark on the 10th of June, which we hope to be able to cover too. --Morten Blaabjerg 14:08, 18 May 2006 (EDT)
Hey Ted, I met Morten Blaabjerg after stopping to ask him about his video equipment, only to be pleasantly surprised that he ran this wiki too! I will have to post his picture. MarkDilley
Wiki Engine v Wiki Farm
Hey Ted, Re: Editthis.info I thought about that too, but went with no because it is a wiki farm rather than a wiki engine. So there were no redundancy/recursive issues. What do you think? MarkDilley
If it does end up being a subpage, then we have an issue. I just couldn't figure out in my head if it would become a subpage or not, my guess is no, but let's keep an eye out for the opposite. MarkDilley
Contribs
My pleasure. :) Szoferka 00:09, 3 June 2006 (EDT)
Real name in the main namespace
Welcome Chris! To go a bit further with Mark's statement, we're encourging everyone to have a page for their name in the main namespace. Yours would be Chris Watkins, of course. Your user page could be redirected there and the talk page from there could be redirected here so you'd still get notification of messages. Hope this makes sense. peace, TedErnst | talk 21:38, 3 September 2006 (EDT)
- Thanks Ted... but to be honest, no it doesn't make sense to me. It doesn't bother me too greatly though - I'm cool with different communities having their own customs, so I'll look at it when I get time. --Chris Watkins (a.k.a. Singkong2005) talk 23:05, 3 September 2006 (EDT)
- Okay, I see the reasoning - it wouldn't be my preferred approach, as it seems confusing, especially for newbies, whereas userspace is already dedicated to pages by and about users. Also takes more work setting up. I can live with it... but can I clarify whether it's a policy, a guideline, or a preference of a majority of active users...? Thanks --Chris Watkins (a.k.a. Singkong2005) talk 02:23, 4 September 2006 (EDT)
- Okay, I see your point now, how active wiki people deserve an article page in this wiki... anyway, I've made the appropriate redirects, so people can find me if they look me up. Can't think too much more about it right now... Thanks --Chris Watkins (a.k.a. Singkong2005) talk 02:46, 4 September 2006 (EDT)
- One option is to put my homepage (really a kind of portal) at Chris Watkins, or is that going overboard? I just don't want to replicate too much of the same material on both sites. --Chris Watkins (a.k.a. Singkong2005) talk 02:53, 4 September 2006 (EDT)
- ...or (thinking about keeping it as an article-type page, rather than a personal page) perhaps I should just put the list of the collaborations I'm involved with at Chris Watkins, plus a link to my homepage?
Can't view your blog
I tried to view your blog and got:
- Parse error: parse error, unexpected T_STRING, expecting T_OLD_FUNCTION or T_FUNCTION or T_VAR or '}' in /home/content/t/e/d/tedernst/html/wp/wp-content/plugins/local_names.php on line 77
I'm using Linux - Opera and Firefox both gave me the above result. --Chris Watkins (a.k.a. Singkong2005) talk 23:07, 3 September 2006 (EDT)
Category Discussion
I'm working on a template to drop at the end of every discussion on categories. The site seems like it needs to "gel" this discussion and this seems like a good way to do it. Probably the template will get deleted later, but "it's a process" :-)
- JenniferForUnity 17:46, 16 October 2006 (EDT)
WikiSize Categories
Hi Ted,
what do you think about refinement in sizes like 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500 etc. ? It seems better to me to say that a wiki has more than 50 articles if it has 95 and rank it higher as wikis with about 11 articles. --Peu 16:38, 17 October 2006 (EDT)