Category talk:Wiki Edit Mode: Difference between revisions

→‎PayToEdit?: is it really a wiki?
(→‎PayToEdit?: is it really a wiki?)
Line 35: Line 35:


: ''Hi, I think that a [[PayToEdit]] category would be a useful tool to express what we think is valuable about [[wiki]].  I do agree with Speckmade that we should figure out how to barnraise some category work around here, (feeling guilty).  I would like to get folks together for an hour or two to trim down the [[Wikis to Add]] - anyone interested? Best, [[MarkDilley]]
: ''Hi, I think that a [[PayToEdit]] category would be a useful tool to express what we think is valuable about [[wiki]].  I do agree with Speckmade that we should figure out how to barnraise some category work around here, (feeling guilty).  I would like to get folks together for an hour or two to trim down the [[Wikis to Add]] - anyone interested? Best, [[MarkDilley]]
:: I agree that we should make categories that are "not surprising" to our readers.
:: If our readers are are surprised to find that wiki in that category, then certainly we should move it to a more "expected" category, even if we have to create an entirely new category.
:: In my opinion, this WikiIndex should list *every* publicly-available wiki, no matter how evil it may be.
:: However, you may be able to convince us that things like this ''"shouldn't be listed on the wiki index, because it's not really a wiki, even if the software they use is distantly related to some wiki engine"''.
:: p.s.: I disagree with the idea that *mentioning* something is the same as "promoting" something. Surely the fact that I mention the "[[Flu Wiki|avian flu virus]]", doesn't mean that I "promote" the spread of that virus?
:: --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 17:41, 10 March 2008 (EDT)