Category talk:New: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Huw Powell (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(What do you think we should do?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
When is a wiki's status no longer New? When it is three months old? Seven months old? --[[User:EarthFurst|EarthFurst]] 19:45, 24 October 2009 (EDT) | When is a wiki's status no longer New? When it is three months old? Seven months old? --[[User:EarthFurst|EarthFurst]] 19:45, 24 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
:I agree, it's a silly cat. "A wiki that's just gone live with no content" - that's how they all start. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 23:00, 24 October 2009 (EDT) | :I agree, it's a silly cat. "A wiki that's just gone live with no content" - that's how they all start. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 23:00, 24 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
:: Yes, all wiki start out that way. I suppose we ''could'' leave a wiki status as "New" indefinitely, until something happens. Until it would be more accurate to call it some other [[:Category:Wiki Status]] -- perhaps "Active" or "Spammed" or "Inactive" or "Dead". What do you think we should do? --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 23:15, 24 October 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 03:15, 25 October 2009
When is a wiki's status no longer New? When it is three months old? Seven months old? --EarthFurst 19:45, 24 October 2009 (EDT)
- I agree, it's a silly cat. "A wiki that's just gone live with no content" - that's how they all start. Huw Powell 23:00, 24 October 2009 (EDT)
- Yes, all wiki start out that way. I suppose we could leave a wiki status as "New" indefinitely, until something happens. Until it would be more accurate to call it some other Category:Wiki Status -- perhaps "Active" or "Spammed" or "Inactive" or "Dead". What do you think we should do? --DavidCary 23:15, 24 October 2009 (EDT)