Page history
User_talk:Zhuyifei1999
6 May 2013
5 May 2013
→Subst vs transcluded templates: no access to the backend
+105
→Subst vs transcluded templates: reply to Sean
+1,289
→Subst vs transcluded templates: fix typeo
m→Subst vs transcluded templates: reply
+309
→Subst vs transcluded templates: reply to YiFei
+451
→User:Emufarmers: reply
+181
→User:Emufarmers
m−2
→User:Emufarmers: edit
+19
→User:Emufarmers: reply
+135
→Subst vs transcluded templates: reply
+199
→User:Emufarmers: backdoor access
+625
→Subst vs transcluded templates: reply to YiFei
+654
→User:Emufarmers: reply
+215
→Subst vs transcluded templates: reply
+152
→User:Emufarmers: new section
+242
→Subst vs transcluded templates: reply, sorry YiFei
+1,308
→Subst vs transcluded templates: reply
+155
It could be protected just for sysops - consider this course of action. Doing the easiest next step. In this case, seeing if it becomes a spam target. My guess is that we won't have to worry about it. Also, I don't think the timestamp can be tra
+371
→Subst vs transcluded templates: format
m+1
→Subst vs transcluded templates
+222
4 May 2013
1 May 2013
→Logos: reply
+530
→Spam fighting / user name space: thank you for helping fight spam
+179
→Template:WikiStatus
+94
30 April 2013
Template:WikiStatus
+368
→Appreciate your effort here!: :: ''Me with a booming smile :-D ~~ ~~~''
+54
→Appreciate your effort here!
+94
→Logos: actually sometimes
+11
→Appreciate your effort here!: new section
+216